Compare revisions: 1784/cci24_2.jpg
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Col Murray [undecipherable] [undecipherable]<sup>1</sup> Feb.78. Discharged <sup>as a Major</sup> [undecipherable]. 25. 80<br>The [undecipherable] at War informs^<sup>me</sup> that he was left out of the<br>arrangement of the [undecipherable] in 1779 -<br>A Resolve of JanY 1.1781 - the Col claims under, which<br>says^<sup>it is the [undecipherable] of [undecipherable]</sup> that [undecipherable] officers who have been exchanged^<sup>since the last arrang.</sup> or are<br>in captivity ought to be arranged^<sup>that</sup> he was exchanged [undecipherable]<br>this arrangement that being by this [undecipherable] liable to be arranged<br>a [undecipherable] of May 22 1779 says that all officers who are or<br>may be exchanged considered as supernumerary officers<br>and entitled to the years pay.<br>May 26. 1781- a Resolves says that the above mentioned<br>year pay should be in the [undecipherable] [undecipherable]-<br>Feb.Y 11 1786 Resolves that this officer who [undecipherable]<br>been Prisoner, with the [undecipherable] and deranged are<br>entitled to the one years pay-<br>It does not appear that Col Murray has ever been<br>annexed to the Line after his derangement.<br> | Col Murray [undecipherable] [undecipherable]<sup>1</sup> Feb.78. Discharged <sup>as a Major</sup> [undecipherable]. 25. 80<br>The [undecipherable] at War informs^<sup>me</sup> that he was left out of the<br>arrangement of the [undecipherable] in 1779 -<br>A Resolve of JanY 1.1781 - the Col claims under, which<br>says^<sup>it is the [undecipherable] of [undecipherable]</sup> that [undecipherable] officers who have been exchanged^<sup>since the last arrang.</sup> or are<br>in captivity ought to be arranged^<sup>that</sup> he was exchanged [undecipherable]<br>this arrangement that being by this [undecipherable] liable to be arranged<br>a [undecipherable] of May 22 1779 says that all officers who are or<br>may be exchanged considered as supernumerary officers<br>and entitled to the years pay.<br>May 26. 1781- a Resolves says that the above mentioned<br>year pay should be in the [undecipherable] [undecipherable]-<br>Feb.Y 11 1786 Resolves that this officer who [undecipherable]<br>been Prisoner, with the [undecipherable] and deranged are<br>entitled to the one years pay-<br>It does not appear that Col Murray has ever been<br>annexed to the Line after his derangement.<br> | ||
| − | <s>in [undecipherable] or [undecipherable] that</s>.<br>Col Murray has produced a return to the War<br>Office^<sup>from [undecipherable]</sup> with <s>[undecipherable]</s>, which he says was deliver<br>in^<sup>to that office</sup> in 1781 - ^<sup>[undecipherable] a list</sup> of the Prisoners who were released from<br>captivity after the arrangement of 1780 and which<br>[undecipherable] [undecipherable] says are to be considered as [undecipherable] officers<br>and instill to half [undecipherable] in which is indicated Col<br>Francis Murray [undecipherable] as a Lt. Col from Apl 17 1780.<br>Col Murray urges that he is in the same situ-<br>ation as Capt. [undecipherable] [undecipherable], who has [undecipherable]<br>his [undecipherable][undecipherable].<br><s>he also says that</s><br>If Col Murray was actually deranged in 1779, it is<br>my opinion that he comes under the Resolves of<br>May 22< | + | <s>in [undecipherable] or [undecipherable] that</s>.<br>Col Murray has produced a return to the War<br>Office^<sup>from [undecipherable]</sup> with <s>[undecipherable]</s>, which he says was deliver<br>in^<sup>to that office</sup> in 1781 - ^<sup>[undecipherable] a list</sup> of the Prisoners who were released from<br>captivity after the arrangement of 1780 and which<br>[undecipherable] [undecipherable] says are to be considered as [undecipherable] officers<br>and instill to half [undecipherable] in which is indicated Col<br>Francis Murray [undecipherable] as a Lt. Col from Apl 17 1780.<br>Col Murray urges that he is in the same situ-<br>ation as Capt. [undecipherable] [undecipherable], who has [undecipherable]<br>his [undecipherable][undecipherable].<br><s>he also says that</s><br>If Col Murray was actually deranged in 1779, it is<br>my opinion that he comes under the Resolves of<br>May 22<sup>d</sup> & May 26.1781- which entitles him to a |