proceeding by any of the parties at war or their subjects or citizens is an infraction of the jurisdiction and rights of the United States which would fall within the principle and remedy of the case stated in my letter
further instructed by the President of the United States to signify to your excellency in your capacity of commander in chief of the militia of your state his desire and request that if the practice which has been mentioned should at any time occur in your state you will effectually interpose to put a stop to it
detain any vessel in respect to which the proceeding shall take place
notify them of the circumstances of the case and the steps which you may have taken to the end that he may give such further direction thereon as may appear proper
deeming the toleration of such a practice to be inconsistent with the duties of neutrality and with the preservation of the peace of the nation
required by any treaty of the United States
concluded that effectual measures ought to be adopted and pursued to prevent a repetition of it
nature and tendency of such conduct
engaged his serious attention and deliberation
consequence of a representation to the president of the United states that lately at the port of Charleston in South Carolina two vessels were commissioned, equipped and manned as privateers on behalf of one of the belligerent powers named in his proclamation