References Indian Treaty, Concern for Nearby Garrisons, Orders for Hostages: Page #2 Original title: 1784/pdc01_2.jpg Protection: Open to all Expiration: Never Status: Approved Mark this revision as complete Cancel References Indian Treaty, Concern for Nearby Garrisons, Orders for Hostages: Page #2 Go full screenExit full screen Layout Reset and when it was () by our order had<br> a writ served upon the officer who executed<br> the order -<br> <br> We had no alternative but that of<br> sending away the sheriff or submitting to<br> the jurisdiction of N(ew) York and ()<br> from the Treaty - We preferred the former<br> but on our departure the officer would be<br> liable to be arrested and we are informed<br> that the proprietors are determined to pursue<br> him to the () + Their names are William<br> Colbreath, Lawrence Tremper and John<br> Elliot, the other sutlers have () the<br> rum that was () by our order and<br> acquired in the propriety of the Proceeding-<br> <br> We have thought it proper to send<br> Lieutenant Mercer the Officer who executed<br> our order to attend your excellency and<br> congress to give first further information<br> as they may desire and receive their orders<br> () with the Troops () his com-<br> mand has our orders to remain at the<br> place to guard the hostages and ()<br> and to take care of the Prisoners that are<br> to be delivered up and () to take<br> possession of Oswego if congress should<br> think proper to order it () the<br> first () proper to<br> mention that ()<br> () and <br> () wish him which will be<br> proper to force the ()<br> () in which consists of about<br> forty men.<br> <br> We () ask a () delivered<br>