Return to revision history
Revision as of 14:35:45, 17 April 2021 by Carneykid
Created page with " On this statement the Secretary of War observed, that the only circumstance which is opposed to [illegible] the progress of the aforesaid petitions would be a rigid co..."
Revision as of 14:40:06, 17 April 2021 by Carneykid
Line 3: Line 3:
 
is opposed to [illegible] the progress of the aforesaid petitions
 
is opposed to [illegible] the progress of the aforesaid petitions
 
would be a rigid construction of the resolved
 
would be a rigid construction of the resolved
 +
of the late congress limiting the time for
 +
producing Stains against the United States.
 +
    While theSecretary of War is deeply
 +
impressed with the importnace of a  firm
 +
[illegible] generally, to the Resolves of limited [ill]
 +
heeis inclined to the opiontion, that the
 +
claims of the afore-mentioned widow &
 +
orphans,  assured with justice be considered
 +
as involved int the before mentioned Resolves
 +
of limitation.
 +
    The resolves of the 2nd of November 1785
 +
and 23rd July 1787, relate to persons leaving
 +
in liquiedated demands for military service,