No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[180]
Caleb Evans Esqr. Accountants Office
F No 5 May 2th 1800
163
I observe in the accounts rendered by you as Pay
Mast General that payments have been made to Brig. Gen.
Wilkinson, for double rations as Commandant of the Western Div-
On reference to the law allowing double rations to officers commanding
separate Posts, it is provided that the Brigadier General while
commander in Chief, shall never double the number of Rations to
which he would otherwise be entitled. From the construction of
this law I am clearly of opinion that when the Brigadier General
ceases to be commander in Chief, that he was no longer entitled
to receive double rations. Under this impression I conceive it proper
that a deduction should take place of the amount of double rations
received by Brig. Gen. Wilkinson as Commandant, from the time [he?]
[he?] ceased to be Commander in Chief; the amount you will
ascertain and cause the same to be deducted from the Pay of the
General, as it may become due.
It may be proper at the same time to inform you that
in conformity with the opinion of the Comptroller of the Treasury,
contained in his letter to the Secretary of War dated the 23 [undecipherable]
last, on the subject of double rations, that I have applied to the
Secretary of War, to state the [undecipherable] when Brig. Gen. Wilkinson
ceased to be commander in Chief, & consequently ceased to [be] entitled
to double rations, that after the Secretary of War on his letter
to me states the [undecipherable] of [undecipherable] has signified to as his private [undecipherable]
that the General is entitled to double rations, yet as he has on the
same letter enclosed a [undecipherable]. I have therefore concluded it proper
to cause the aforementioned deductions to take place on the opinion
I before expressed; it will however be understood that this defi[undecipherable]