Examination of Receipts
Document 1800Examination of receipts submitted by Morris yielded conclusion that Morris followed the rules of the Office regarding submissions of receipts for reimbursement. Simmons then explained the lack of consistency in the accounts of Mr. Baker were due to Morris' vague explanation on record keeping.
100%
⇣No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[36]
[Noel Marros Capt / Cap't of [undecipherable] / For M. Henry]
Accountants Office
April 12th 1800
Sir
I duly received yours of the 11 Inst: & in reply have to observe that the Present rule as required by the Contractor instead of the original closes Payments is consistent with the rules of this Office, The object is to prevent a multiplicity of Issues which would otherwise be calculated and answer considerably impede the examination of Accounts it is therefore enforced & required in all cases unless the particular accounts are broken up and a general one given in lieu thereof, that the Transcriber should as fully express every memorandum as the originals show they could have done.
This apparent deviation from the mode which for long was adopted respecting all Timber accounts arose from your not being sufficiently explicit in your abstracts which made it necessary in many instances to have recourse to the original rules to ascertain with accuracy the nature of the charges.
Sam'l [undecipherable]
Capt John Henry April 15th 1800
New Port R. I.
Sir
I have recd your letter dated the 12 Ulto: The Secretary of War enclosing an account for overhaul, a Copy [undecipherable] Regulations issued by the Secretary of War is affixed that a Surgeon is entitled to be furnished with one ration, that no compensation is to be received by or paid to officers in lieu of Quarters, but the [undecipherable] meaning the payment for Quarters [undecipherable]
Type
Author's Letterbook Copy
Description
Examination of receipts submitted by Morris yielded conclusion that Morris followed the rules of the Office regarding submissions of receipts for reimbursement. Simmons then explained the lack of consistency in the accounts of Mr. Baker were due to Morris' vague explanation on record keeping.
Date
04/14/1800
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Accountant's Office
Document number
1800041421755
Page start
86
Notable persons
Captain Staats Morris
William Simmons
contractor
Mr. Baker
1st Regiment Artillerists and Engineers
Notable locations
Fort McHenry
Accountant's Office
Baltimore
Maryland
Notable items
accounts
papers
returns
abstracts
requisition

