Charges Against David Ames of Springfield Armory
Document 1799Copy of charges exhibited against Daniel Ames, Superintendent of the Armory at Springfield, handed to the Board of Inquiry previous to their sitting. There are four such charges, accusing Ames of malfeasance while in office. Joseph Williams is paymaster and public storekeeper at the same armory.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Copy] Copy of Charges exhibited against David Ames Superintendant of the Armoury at this Post Springfield & handed to the Chairman of the Board of Inquiry some time previous to their filing —
1st Some time in the year 179- Mr Ames proposed to a Merchant in this town, that if he would let him & his family, have goods at the first cost, he would purchase of him the clothing for the United States Apprentices & that he might put on them a good profit. & the said Merchant did pay to the said Ames a large sum of money, under assurances from Ames that he would give him the custom of the Armoury [strikethrough: illegible]
2- James Washbourn formerly an Armour employed in the Works says that some time in the month of May 1799 Mr Ames [strikethrough: proposed] [strikethrough: illegible] him that if he (Washborn) would take Alpheus Packard his [Ames's] Apprentice under [strikethrough: his care] the Month of June, & teach him the art of bricking Guns, that he [Washbourn] should have the benefit of his work — that he took the Boy accordingly & was made up on the pay Rolls of the Armorers for the Month of June $8. 00/100 in addition to his former wages — being
being for extra work done by the help of said Boy — & that the said Alpheus was made up besides Eight Dollars & 9/100 which money Mr Ames received as Washbourn says to the injury of himself & the United States —
3d. It is reported that Jedediah Hammon an Apprentice to the Superintendants Father received pay & Rations while he was dealing for the small Pox & did no work — It is a well known fact that the custom in the Trade was, that if a man lost one day his Rations were Stoped —
4th It cannot be the intention of the United States that the Superintendant of so respectable Establishment should injure or refuse to pay an Individual for services justly performed & work absolutely returned in — for back money secretly promised — which appears to be the Gun [strikethrough: illegible] of Wm. W. Sampson & Saml. Walker as per their Petitions to me will shew, aided by their testimony — [strikethrough: illegible]
Joseph H Williams
Type
Copy of Signed Document
Description
Copy of charges exhibited against Daniel Ames, Superintendent of the Armory at Springfield, handed to the Board of Inquiry previous to their sitting. There are four such charges, accusing Ames of malfeasance while in office. Joseph Williams is paymaster and public storekeeper at the same armory.
Date
1799
Author
Recipient
Document number
1799999991301
Page start
5
Note
Enclosed in Williams to Hodgdon, 09/13/1800.
Notable persons
Joseph Williams
David Ames
superintendent
superintendant
Samuel Hodgdon
Byers
tribunal
Lyman
merchant
James Washbourn
Notable locations
Springfield
Massachusetts
Notable items
armory
investigate
musket barrels
guns
testimony

