No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
Accountants Office
October 27th 1799
Sir
By a letter received from the Secretary of W[ar] to me dated the 14 Instt he observes that "the President of the Unit[ed]
" States referred to me a complaint made to him by a citizen, that the
" usual reward of ten dollars had been refused to him, for appreh[ending]
" & delivering up to a military Officer a Deserter from Capt Millers [Company]
" of Infantry. This claim appears to have been grounded upon a l[etter]
" from Callender Irvine, Captain in the 2d Regiment of Artill[ery, stating]
" that the Deserter had been delivered to him at the Barracks, [at]
" Pennsylvania on the 23d November 1798, by a Mr Hugh McAlliste[r &]
" also a certificate from Francis Gibson Lieutenant 2d Co 2d of Artill[ery]
" that the same Deserter was tried at Reading, and found guilty of [desertion]
" there are endorsements upon these certificates, one by yourself dated [the]
" 16 August last, asserting that they were presented to you by Hugh
" McAllister for the allowance and that you informed him it could not be
" allowed. another by the Pay master General of the same date, purporting
" that if the Accountant could not allow this claim he was not at liberty
" to settle it. The President's orders to me are, that I shall enquire [and]
" satisfy myself that justice is done in this case." — to which I replied
on the 16th Instant.
As respects the complaint made by a citizen to the [President]
of the United States that the usual reward had been refused him for
apprehending a Deserter of Capt Millers Company I have to observ[e]
that no evidence appeared in the muster Rolls that the person appreh[ended]
was a deserter, neither did it appear that he had been advertised as such,
or any reward offered for his apprehension. The claim was on these
grounds rejected, such proof being thought necessary previous to the [claim]
being allowed."
As the representation in question was made to [you,]
I shall with your permission, state that Hugh McAllister, the [person]
presenting the claim, was a notary Public at Carlisle and was one of
a number of persons indited for practising frauds on the United States,
in presenting false Powers of Attorney & thereon receiving from the [Register]
of the Treasury & War soldiers settlements. that it appears that as notary
Public he had granted his signature & Official Seal to papers conn[ected]
with intent to defraud the United States. that on the Trial of the said
Hugh McAllister, the only evidences that could be produced were [some]
of the party concerned, and were deemed insufficient to convict [him &]
there is however with me no doubt but that he was concerned
in these practices - and this with the reasons I have stated to the
Secretary of War led me to reject the claim presented by Hugh McAlliste[r]
& they were deemed sufficient by the Comptroller of the Treasury to
whom an appeal is directed in cases where claimants are dissatisfied with
my decision, - I have taken the liberty to state those particulars that
the President of the United States might be in possession of the reasons
which induced me to reject the claim in question, and I flatter myself
they will be deemed sufficient. -
I have the honor to be
Sir very respectfully
Your most Obedt Servt.
[signature]
[signature]
His Excellency
The President of the United States.