Letter from the Accountant of the War Department
Document 1799Simmons addresses grievances levied by Eddins: Eddins asserts that Capt. Blackburn and Lt. Claiborne received rations for their servants while he has not.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
Samuel Eddens, Captn Accountants Office
2 Regt A&C. August 23d 1799
Richmond Va
Sir Your letter of the 16 Instant came duly to hands and am sorry to observe the false construction you have placed upon my conduct respecting some of your claims conscious of having acted consistent with the duties of my Office I must still adhere to my former decision; but as I am anxious to give perfect satisfaction to every claimant whose accounts come under my notice. I shall once more go over the subject of your demands —
You say privileges have been granted to Capt Blackburn & Lieutt Claiborne by permitting them to draw rations for their Servants, which has been denied to you, this position is foreign from your claim their Servants were duly inlisted men, (or if not it was at least so understood) & of course they were intitled to draw their rations provided they had never been included in any other returns — but your demand is for a Servant which you acknowledge was not an Inlisted Soldier, consequently by the rule laid down, the ration drawn by you for him must be absolutely placed to your debit on the Books of this Office, — unless the Secy of War should see fit to adopt some general rule to supersede his former directions — you intimate that I have shewn a partiality to Capt Blackburn & Lieutt Saunders, by granting to them house rent and will not allow you the rent of a room — here, Sir, you are again misinformed — no such thing has ever been allowed to those Officers at this Office — tho' I believe there were some Officers doing Garrison duty at Fort Norfolk who were allowed the rent of their Houses, in a settlement of the Contractors account last Year at the Treasury — this was done by express orders of the Secretary, in consequence of a representation from the Officers, that there were no buildings in the Fort of any kind, particularly for the reception of Officers some of whom had families — representations of this nature will undoubtedly have considerable weight with the Secretary of War & should he deem fit to establish general principles for allowances of the nature of your demands, I shall have no hesitation in granting it —
The next grievance you mention is the rejecting from the Contractors accounts so much paid by him to you for the unadvanced fuell due to you, Lieutt Pope & Cadet Carey, the following quotations from a late letter of the Secretary of War has I conceive fully authorized the rejection of the claims — 'The practice relative to fuell not drawn by Officers from any cause whatever has never been settled, I believe however that few demands have ever been made for payment of this kind & that it has never been allowed but under peculiar circumstances —
I incline strongly to the opinion that it would
Type
Letterbook
Description
Simmons addresses grievances levied by Eddins: Eddins asserts that Capt. Blackburn and Lt. Claiborne received rations for their servants while he has not.
Date
08/23/1799
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Accountant's Office
Document number
1799082321555
Page start
256
Notable persons
Captain Samuel Eddins
William Simmons
2nd Regiment of Artillery and Engineers
Lt. Pope
Cadet Cary
contractor
Notable locations
Richmond, Virginia
Accountant's Office
Fort Norfolk
Notable items
fuel

