Description of Payroll Discrepancy
Document 1799Vance asks why his official pay period starts after the date he considers his appointment. He explains the discrepancy between the muster rolls and actual enlistment.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[J. G. Vance
O[undecipherable] letter
Sec'y of war
19. Aug. 1799—
Philadelphia]
Philad'a Aug. 19 1799
Sir In making up my accounts on C.M'r late
Northampton expedition, I charged pay at the rate
of 30 dollars, p' mo. for my services from 1 Apr.
the date of my appointment, to 24 July- and those
have extended it entill the accounts were finally
adjusted and myself exonerated from the responsibility
but being appointed Dep'ty Pay Master to the Troops
on the Western Frontiers on the 25 July, the pay
for which duty will of course commence with
the appointment- I have thought proper thus to
limit it. — A statement of the above mentioned ac-
counts were shewn me in the Accountants office on
Saturday last, by which it appears that my pay is
allowed from 1 Apr'd to 9 May only — on what ground
this deduction has been made, I cannot possibly
conjecture — and I believe the Accountant has been
equally at a loss having stated no objection whatever
notwithstanding I had his promise but a few days before
that in case there should be objections to any of the
items charged in the account, they should be stated.
On the 9 May (to which time the Acc't has been
graciously pleased to extend my pay) few of the Mus-
ters were complete, and of course no part of the
payments had taken place — It is a principle
too well established, in cases like the present, to
require repetition, that the Musters must precede
the payments — The account has in contradiction to the
evidence, on the face of the Muster rolls of the
Guard and Staff officers, that said Muster was made on
the 9 May — and I assert (which can be proved) that
many of the other Muster rolls were not put into
my hands untill after that date — those being the
facts, it appears to belong of course that my pay should
have been extended to some period later than the
result of the Muster rolls - that period, in my mind
(which I think founded on justice, and which I know
to be supported by precedent) [undecipherable] to be governed by
the final close of the Accounts - provided there was
[undecipherable] of diligence or unnecessary delay in the [undecipherable]
cause of the duty [undecipherable] on my part in [undecipherable]
presumption, proof to the reverse of which, I beg
leave to refer you to a correspondence between
the Pay M'r Gen'l (whilst at Pittsburgh) and myself
on the subject of the appointment which I have
since [undecipherable], from that affair [undecipherable], by which it will
appear that I was extremely anxious to have
Phil'd to enter on the duties of said appoint-
ment, but was necessarily detained for the
purpose of settling and adjusting the aforesaid
accounts — The P.M.G. is in possession of those
letters. — Gen'l MacPherson has positively prom-
ised to wait on you in the course of this day
and make such explanations as the case may
require. — I have already stated that I
had charged pay to 24 July only — I have been
detained here at a considerable expense, ever
since that period, solely for the purpose of
effecting a settlement of those accounts — obli-
gations have been made to them where none
existed — and I believe merely from personal
motives of which the case in question is a
striking proof. — I submit to you to determine
to what time you deem me entitled to pay and
also whether some compensation [should not?] be
allowed me by the public, from 25 July to the
present time, to meet the expenses which I have
necessarily been put to in consequence of my detention
here — I would not make this claim if I did
not believe it just — If however, it will be
likely to involve any difficulty, I will relinquish
it. — I hope Sir, you will from the foregoing
statement feel yourself enabled to determine
to what time you consider me in service as
Pay Master and entitled to compensation —
I am Sir with the utmost
Respect — yo' most ob't Serv't
James Vance
The Hon'ble
The Sec'y of War.
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Vance asks why his official pay period starts after the date he considers his appointment. He explains the discrepancy between the muster rolls and actual enlistment.
Date
08/19/1799
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Philadelphia
Repository
Collection
Document number
1799081940001
Page start
1
Notable persons
James McHenry
Samuel Vance
General MacPherson
William MacPherson
troops
William Simmons
Paymaster General
Caleb Swan
Notable locations
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh
Northampton, Pennsylvania
Western Frontier
Accountants Office
Notable items
accounts
Northampton expedition
rate
musters
correspondence
objections
compensation

