Ownership of Provisions at New York
Document 1799Based on an investigation of the contractor's accounts for 1798, it is obvious that the provisions that remained on hand at the beginning of the present year must be public property. If the contractors had not been paid, his own interest would have induced him to regain possession of this property
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Docket on exterior of folded letter: Comptrollers office / July 30. 1799. / [undecipherable] to / [undecipherable] June 2[undecipherable] / depositing a quantity [undecipherable] / [undecipherable] the fortifications at / New York]
Treasury Department,
Comptroller's Office,
July 30. 1799
Sir,
I received your letter of the 27. instant enclosing one from Ebenezer Stevens to you dated the 23d, concerning a quantity of provisions deposited at the fortifications at New York. —
From an investigation of the Contractors accounts for the year 1798, which have been settled at the Treasury, it is obvious that any provisions which remained on hand at the beginning of the present year, of deposits made during the last, must be public property. This conclusion is drawn principally from the circumstance of the Contractors charges admitted at the Treasury, being all founded on the requisitions of officers, supported by proper receipts for the delivery of the provisions required; and it may be fairly inferred, if the Contractor had not been paid for all that were deposited, his own interest would long since have induced him to regain possession of his property. Besides, it may be remarked that in some instances the requisitions and receipts, neither specify the time for which the supplies were required, nor the number of men for whose consumption, they were intended. From this cause, it is probable, the surplus has arisen.
This surplus, whatever it may be, can only be ascertained (unless by an actual survey) by a comparison between the quantities furnished at each post and the number of troops stationed thereat. The documents on file at the Treasury will afford the former, those of your own Department, the latter information. Colo Stevens's letter is herewith returned.
I am, Sir, very respectfully,
Your Obt. Servt.
David Rawn
Pr. Clk.
William Simmons Esqr.
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Based on an investigation of the contractor's accounts for 1798, it is obvious that the provisions that remained on hand at the beginning of the present year must be public property. If the contractors had not been paid, his own interest would have induced him to regain possession of this property
Date
07/30/1799
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Treasury Department
Document number
1799073070001
Page start
1
Notable persons
William Simmons
David Rann
Notable locations
Treasury Department

