Want of clothing for troops in Connecticut
Document 1799Expresses regret that soldiers in Litchfield are in need of clothing, stating that it harms efforts to encourage recruitment into the army. Explains the deficiencies by arguing that occasions arise that it make it difficult to fulfill certain needs, and states that ships carrying materials have not yet arrived. Also upset at the report that the hats and shoes are of poor quality, which he admits has no good excuse.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Draft]
[Docket on verso: 21 June 1799 / James [undecipherable] / [undecipherable]]
War Dep.t 21 June 1799
D.r Sir,
I have received your letter, dated Litchfield, [strikethrough: his] 17th inst, and thank you for the free and friendly communications it contains. [strikethrough: It is in this by which [undecipherable] the that we are only advertised of any [undecipherable] an economy into [undecipherable]]
It is much to be regretted, that any part of the soldiers cloathing should fail in quantity or quality at any time, and particularly at the present when every encouragement should be offered that might induce respectable native citizens to enter into the army.
Circumstances however, over which there is no controul, will sometimes occur, that [strikethrough: accidental activity of no avail, and] of cloathing will occasion deficiencies in the quantity, or require a change of materials. [strikethrough: All of this [undecipherable] happened last year:] [strikethrough: the last year.] Of the first I shall say nothing because [strikethrough: the other [undecipherable]] a sufficiency of white kerseys for vests and overalls, and of blue Cloth suitable for coats could not be found in the U.S. in consequence of which neither [strikethrough: the old contracts nor could also] on the [undecipherable] of [undecipherable] and of captains, of the former article sent for by the contractor himself, it became impossible [strikethrough: him] to comply with his contract [strikethrough: [undecipherable] the requisite quantity for the additional [undecipherable]] and for the [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] to procure [strikethrough: what did not exist.] [strikethrough: [undecipherable]]
It will be recollected, that the quantity of cloathing wanted per [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] new regiments [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] is very considerable; that the Spring ships, by which we were to export a great part of the materials [strikethrough: to supply [undecipherable] deficiency, in [undecipherable] materials [undecipherable] to [undecipherable],] to arrive, have not yet all made their appearance, and that it requires a vast exertion after the materials [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] provided to make up so many thousand suits; and that being obliged [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] to purchase [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] at all [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] answer the [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] be some [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] varieties in the quality [strikethrough: of [undecipherable]] [strikethrough: [undecipherable]]
To guard as much as possible against such deficiencies in future, I have directed [strikethrough: the] Purveyor to engage [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] manufacturers in Massachusetts to be [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] employed
[strikethrough: Both] Hats and shoes ought not to be defective in quality — When this happens, there [strikethrough: or [undecipherable] who [undecipherable] them.] must have been inattention in the Inspectors — [strikethrough: The former had] [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] is intended and was supposed to be, of the same quality, [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] as [those] for the army, [strikethrough: were,] before and since my coming into office. The bad quality [strikethrough: both these articles] of [strikethrough: [undecipherable], from] your representation of these [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] Col. [undecipherable] will induce me, to have a strict inquiry made into its cause.
I shall likewise request Col. Wadsworth, to whom I shall forward two pairs of pattern shoes — with a view to a more perfect comparison of quality, and [strikethrough: near] price, [strikethrough: To [undecipherable] to] contract for one thousand pair in Connecticut. You may be pleased to inform [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] of this circumstance that he may be in season to make his proposals.
The enclosed letter, will show you that arms were ordered to be delivered at the armory at Springfield for Co. [undecipherable] Regiment, and transported to the place or places of rendezvous he should direct. That Col. Wadsworth had similar orders respecting and a [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] of Cartouche boxes. Col. Wadsworth had similar orders respecting [strikethrough: [undecipherable]]
with very great esteem &
regard I am Sir
[undecipherable]
Humble
James [undecipherable]
Type
Draft Letter
Description
Expresses regret that soldiers in Litchfield are in need of clothing, stating that it harms efforts to encourage recruitment into the army. Explains the deficiencies by arguing that occasions arise that it make it difficult to fulfill certain needs, and states that ships carrying materials have not yet arrived. Also upset at the report that the hats and shoes are of poor quality, which he admits has no good excuse.
Date
06/21/1799
Author
Recipient
Sent from
War Department
Repository
Collection
Document number
1799062100201
Page start
1
Notable persons
John Allen
James McHenry
army
contractor
purveyor
regiments
manufacturer
inspector
Wadsworth
Marsh
Taylor
Notable locations
Litchfield
Connecticut
Massachusetts
armory
Springfield
Notable items
Clothing
vests
overalls
kersey
cloth
coats
ships
suits
manufacture
shoes
hats
price

