Effort to Clarify Misunderstanding of Shot Report
Document 1799Refers to indisposition of Mr. Faesch. Regrets misunderstanding of parts of his letter about his shot reports in New York and Elizabeth Town. Clarifies that he made no report and will not until he has heard from them. Clarifies shot receipt from Col. Stevens and explains mistake.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (model sonnet 4.6). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
Philadelphia 29th January 1798
Gentlemen
I have received the Accountants Statement of Major Sanghums Accounts. By it I am informed the Bill presented by you cannot be taken up at present. I have written to Major Sangham on the subject, and doubt not he will make provision for the Bill, in case the Statement enclosed to him should be [undecipherable] accurate. I feel myself bound to give you the most early information [undecipherable]
Your most Obedient Servant
Messrs Drake & Commegys. Samuel Hodgdon
Philadelphia 29th Jany 1798.
Sir
In consequence of the presentment of your Draft on me dated the 1st instt for 850 Dollars in favour of Messrs Evans & Selby and by them and a subsequent endorsement made payable to Messrs Drake & Commegys of this City, I immediately called on Mr Simmons the Accountant to know the State of your Accounts, as he had undertaken their adjustment; the result of my enquiries you will learn by the enclosed Statement of your Account, and by the other which the Accountant informs me he has sent to you. It is plain, according to your apprehensions signified in your letter that accompanied your Draft that there is a mistake somewhere & of course your Draft could not be honoured. It is possible some of your Accounts and vouchers may not have got to hand, but in whatever shape any mistake may have arisen, you will have it in your power by perusing the two Statements; you will receive to set all right. You will recollect that Leonard Davis's receipt admitted in the enclosed Statement, is not a perfect Document, and that in answer to a former letter on that Subject you promised to obtain such an one as Requested, let it be done, and sent in your next communication. Also a special order on Mr Simmons, to pay me the balance due you on his adjustment of your Accounts. Your letter to that effect, he does not deem sufficient.
The sooner you attend to this business the better, as it is desirable to have it closed while the business is fresh in all our memories. I am very sorry that your Draft under circumstances could not be honored.
I am Sir
Your most Obedient Servant
Major C. Sangham. Samuel Hodgdon.
Type
Author's Letterbook Copy
Description
Refers to indisposition of Mr. Faesch. Regrets misunderstanding of parts of his letter about his shot reports in New York and Elizabeth Town. Clarifies that he made no report and will not until he has heard from them. Clarifies shot receipt from Col. Stevens and explains mistake.
Date
05/28/1799
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Philadelphia
Repository
Document number
1799052828155
Page start
457
Notable persons
multiple
Samuel Hodgdon
John Jacob Faesch
Ebenezer Stevens
Notable locations
Philadelphia
New York
Elizabeth
Notable items
Report
Receipt
Shot


