Discusses Officers in North and South Carolina and Kentucy
Document 1799Expresses consideration of troops, numbering regiments, and appointment of officers. Lists officers in North and South Carolina and Kentucky.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[undecipherable]
[undecipherable] the
Two letters from you after [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] with the [last?] papers & them
[undecipherable]
[undecipherable] you be it, that a plan may be
considered for numbering the Regiments
and [arranging?] the rank of the Lt. Colonels
[undecipherable] upon for consideration
[undecipherable]
[undecipherable] to I observe.
It being [undecipherable] to commence
the recruiting service, to [advise?], or without
[receiving?] the appointment of officers
the States could take [place?]
able, as the buttons for each Regiment
is be numbered, to [fix?] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] for [undecipherable] them [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] always [at?] it or have [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] question [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
its [selection?] [undecipherable] Colonels [undecipherable]
[undecipherable]
[undecipherable] my [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] men be [extended?] to the [whole?] [Regiments?]
and [others?] could not be [discharged?] without
great injury to the service [undecipherable] [the?]
[because?] of age should be [appointed?] [undecipherable]
have been governed by [geographical?]
[losses?], according to the order [which?] was
adopted [last?] was when the arm[y?] faced
the sea board. This rule appeared to me
as good as any other and less liable to
criticism.
The result is, that [undecipherable] two
Regiments to be raised in [Georgia?] & the
Carolinas [Georgia?] & Kentucky were to be
numbered 5 & 6. That of which W. Bentley
is Lt. Colonel commandant No 7. That of
which Tho. Parker is Lt. Colonel No 8. That of
which Josias C. Hall is [Lt.?] Colonel No 9.
That of which Ths. Moore is 2t Col No 10. That
of which [Irvon?] Aeden is 1e Col. No 11. That
of which [undecipherable] G. [undecipherable] is 2t. Col. No 12. That
[undecipherable] Timothy Taylor is [Lt. Col.] No 13. That
of which N. [undecipherable] is Lt. Col. No [undecipherable] [that?] of
[undecipherable]
[and?] [undecipherable: Harnewell?] is Lt. Col. No 15 That
[it?] is to comprehend the companies
[to be?] raised in New Hampshire Vermont
[and?] Rhode Island No 16.
It also appeared proper to adopt
[undecipherable] whatever it might be, for the
[undecipherable] arrangement of the numbering of the
Regiments [which?] would be permanently
convenient, and in future cases would
[undecipherable] consistent effort. This would
[undecipherable] me learn the case, if the relative
rank of the first commandants of the
Regiments was to govern. When Regiment
[undecipherable] (for example) [lost?] its commandant
[by?] promotion death, resignation or
[undecipherable], his successor would be the
[senior?] of all the Lt. Colonels, and the
Regiment would either lose its action
originally acquired by the accidental
rank of its commandant, or it would
[claim?] it, in contradiction of that rule
[that?] [undecipherable] commandant was the
junior
junior of [the?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable]. [undecipherable]
this incongruity the commandant[s], [if?]
[to?] be removed, so that No 2 might become
No 1. the dislocation would be [at?] it
with injurious effects. All the [undecipherable]
[to?] be derived from the [attachment?] [and?]
confidence of office, and [order?] to the
particular commander would frequently
be [lost?] in the midst of a [camp?] [undecipherable], and
the discipline of all the corps [undecipherable] not
[undecipherable] [suffer?] and [undecipherable] to change [undecipherable].
[undecipherable] [undecipherable] moreover were [employed?]
in [different?] armies in extreme parts of the
U.S. [undecipherable] commandants would be also
constantly [itinerant?], [leaping?] from
[army?] to another.
It was on these and [other?] [undecipherable]
that I was [induced?] to adopt a [method?]
[of?] numbering the Regiments. [This?] is to
have the sanction of [Court?] was [undecipherable]
was [also?] to the [reconsidering?] [undecipherable], and
[undecipherable] the relative rank of the Lt. Colonels
[to?] be hereafter settled. [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] [undecipherable]
With great respect
I have the honor to be &.
[Docket: 22d April. 1797
[undecipherable]]
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Expresses consideration of troops, numbering regiments, and appointment of officers. Lists officers in North and South Carolina and Kentucky.
Date
04/22/1799
Author
Recipient
Repository
Collection
Document number
1799042200201
Page start
1
Note
Illegible document.
Notable persons
John Adams
James McHenry
Mr. Bentley
Mr. Parker
Isaac C. Hale
Thomas Moore
Timothy Taylor
Notable locations
North Carolina
South Carolina
Kentucky

