Controversy over the lack of a commission for a Massachusetts local
Document 1798Representative Sedgwick writes to McHenry expressing his constituent's disappointment in the failure of the War Department to offer a local gentleman Samuel Church a commission.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Cambridge April 8. p. ??? ill]
The Honble
James McHenry Esqre
Secy at war,
Philadelphia.
---
Stukbridge 1st April 1799.
Dr Sir.
Samd. W Church is appointed an Ensign, but has not recd a commission. He is the only officer in this neighbourhood; and if stationed could undoubtedly recruit considerably. There is in the post office in this town a letter from you directed to Alpheus Cheney. There is not in this part of the State any family of that name — probably Stukbridge is mistaken for Sturbridge, in a near which place the family of Cheney resides.
The friends of Mr Mackay & himself are disappointed at the failure of his appointment. As he is a young gentleman who has been in service & as well respectable as reported, I join them in their regret.
I am very respectfully,
Dear Sir,
your most obedt. Servt.
Theodre Sedgwick.
Secy at war.
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Representative Sedgwick writes to McHenry expressing his constituent's disappointment in the failure of the War Department to offer a local gentleman Samuel Church a commission.
Date
04/01/1798
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Stockbridge
Repository
Collection
Document number
1799040140101
Page start
1
Note
Cited in McHenry to Sedgwick, 05/14/1799.
Notable persons
James McHenry
Theodore Sedgwick
Samuel W. Church
Alpheus Cheney
Mackey
officers
Notable locations
Philadelphia
Stockbridge
Massachusetts
Notable items
Commission

