Avoiding Inconvenience from the Muskets' Delay, Etc.
Document 1799Responding to Hodgdon's concern that the muskets would not arrive in time, Kilty applied one of the muskets already on hand to the purpose for which the others had been directed so no inconvenience should arise.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
Now I have all the pages. Let me compile the full transcription.
[Docket, cover panel: Received / State Dep't. / Nov. 24, 1891 / R.P.O. 401310. (36)]
[Docket notation: [undecipherable] / [undecipherable] / 1799 —]
Supervisor's Office
Baltimore, February 11th 1799
Sir
On the receipt of your Letter of the 1st instant I went to Fells Point, and after some Search; found the person therein mentioned, not at Price's, but at another Ship Yard. I called him aside, and informed him of your claim. I [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] what he said on [undecipherable] —
the letter which he afterwards determined to write [undecipherable] which is herewith inclosed. I demanded some Security for [the] payment of the moneys if, after time had been allowed for [the] necessary explanations, he should not be able to convince you that it was not justly due. He did not immediately consent to give such Security, but promised to come up to my Office the next morning. He came accordingly, and after some considerations went back with a kind of obligation which I had [undecipherable] up; and which he promised to shew to a Mr Weedon, with whom he appears to have some engagements, and procure his signature to it; if, upon consultation, they should agree that such an obligation ought to be given. He came again this day to my office, accompanied by Mr Weedon, but did not seem inclined to give any security, untill an answer should be made to the letter already referred to which he had in the interim prepared. I readily agreed to forward his letter, but insisted on some kind of Security for the ultimate paym[ent]
of the claim if it should be found due; and at length obtained Mr Weedon's Signature to the paper of which a Copy is enclosed. It is not so precise as the one I had first drawn, but I could not get a stricter obligation Signed, and I thought it better to take this than to Institute a suit for the same; I believe, loose and informal as it is, that it yet secures the claim, but I cannot help wishing that [there] may be [something] disclosed, on further examination, Sufficient to [undecipherable] —
[undecipherable] the decency of his behaviour in the conversation I have had with him excite this sentiment, which however Shall not prevent me from taking any further measures that you may hereafter think proper to suggest.
I State this occasion to acknowledge your Letters of the 7th and 14th of December 1798. The latter arrived long before the [former,] and judging from it's contents that the Musquets would not come in time, I applied [those] already in my hands to the purpose for which these last had been directed to be sent; a step from which no inconvenience can arise, as I mark them all in the same manner. Your letter of the 7th was accompanied by the one from Mr Zebulon Hollingsworth of which a Copy is enclosed. The Musquets have not yet arrived and I have heard no more about them — Perhaps you can find the means of giving them a start from the place where they lie.
I am Sir
Your Most obedient Servant
John Kilty
Samuel Hodgdon Esqr
---
[Enclosure — back cover docket: Received / State Dep[t.] / Nov. 24, [1891] / R.P.O. [401810]. Docket notation: [undecipherable].]
Bal[timore] [undecipherable] [179?]
[(35)]
[The body of this enclosure is severely water-damaged and largely illegible throughout. What can be discerned follows:]
I have seen [your?] Letter that [you?] sent here [to?] [undecipherable] —
[to?] the Officer[s?] of the Revenue respecting My [undecipherable]
at [Fells?] [Point?]. [When?] he [undecipherable] [undecipherable], for my
[Expenses?] [undecipherable] [your?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable]. [When?] [I?]
left [Fells?] [Point?] to go to Philadelphia [I?] did [undecipherable]
To Return Again [undecipherable] give the [same?] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] [had?] not [Agree?] —
[from?] [proceed?] to Philadelphia [undecipherable] at [all?] — [When?] [you?]
[undecipherable] Proceed to [Fells?] [Point?] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] [immediately?] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] for the [Master?] and
Baltimore [went?] to work at the [undecipherable] Making of [the?] [undecipherable] and
[undecipherable] [found?] [some?] that were [undecipherable]
[of?] [the?] [undecipherable] now [until?] the [Work?] was
Sufficient to Launch. he [undecipherable]
Continue [my?] wages [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] and [See?]
[undecipherable] [ten?] [Dollar?]s
[undecipherable] he would not Agree with
[undecipherable] [I?] [would?] not [go?] to Philadelphia or to Baltimore
[I?] the [undecipherable] here for a Settlement which he Refused
[undecipherable] [month?] which I [could?] not
[undecipherable] that it was not [meaning?] a farthing —
[Continuation, also severely damaged:]
[One?] [Clarke?] [undecipherable] understood that Mr [undecipherable] [Carey?] has
Written to you that I was not at work at [Philadelphia?] —
[undecipherable] you the fact [was?] I was at [Philadelphia?]
and the Next [undecipherable] [the?] [Galley?] I have Mentioned
[undecipherable]
In Philadelphia I was Employed —
by the [United?] States [When?] I thought [When?] a Contract
[was?] [undecipherable] was made [till?] I found it to the
Contrary and I [Mention?] this [to?] [undecipherable] [Carey?] [Would?] not
[undecipherable] [the?] [Balance?] due —
[take?] travelling [undecipherable] [one?] Hundred Miles at My
Expense; for [that?] Reason [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] the Contract that was —
[undecipherable] not only that and not to be [Paid?] [There?] for my
[undecipherable] Money to Fells Point [When?] he did not [undecipherable]
but not only that but not [undecipherable] [Any?] Money
from the [last?] [undecipherable] —
I [am?] at Work at Fells Point at My [Expense?] —
here and [Are?] Willing to Answer any Demands on
[undecipherable] from —
[undecipherable]
[undecipherable] this
letter that [undecipherable] you when
it [some?] [has?] [undecipherable] to [sign?] it
---
[Copy]
Elkton January 17th 1799
Sir
A few days a go I received a line from Samuel Hodgdon Esquire, informing me that he had Sent a Box containing two Musquets, by a Waggon from Philadelphia requesting me to forward the box to you by the Land Stage after much inquiry and search I yesterday found the Box up in Chester County about ten Miles from this place. The Waggon having met with a load of goods for that place left the box there soon as I can get it [undecipherable] Shall Send it to you by the Land Stage.
This accompanies the letter I found with the Box of Musquets.
Your humble Servant
(Signed [Zebulon?] [undecipherable] Hollingsworth
John Kilty Esquire
Supervisor of the Revenue
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Responding to Hodgdon's concern that the muskets would not arrive in time, Kilty applied one of the muskets already on hand to the purpose for which the others had been directed so no inconvenience should arise.
Date
02/11/1799
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Baltimore
Document number
1799021180102
Page start
6
Notable persons
Samuel Hodgdon
John Kilty
Notable locations
Baltimore

