Philadelphia 24^th Jany 1799. Sir, On examining the Petition of David Jones Superintendent of Armourers and Robert [undecipherable] master Armourer at Springfield, I find they do not ask for an increase of rations, as is stated in the extract from the [undecipherable] signed [undecipherable] W. bonds block, but for an allowance of rations having never received any. In looking over the provisions made for persons of the same description under former establishments it appears that allowances for rations have been invariably made, and settlements without demur have taken place, notwithstanding they were not expressly sanctioned by law. Many reasons might be urged to show the justice, policy & propriety of allowing rations. Barrack room & fuel to persons employed as heads, or overseers of mechanical branches to important Public establishments. But I shall content myself with observing that they are often so situated as renders it impossible to procure provisions without a great loss of time & additional expence, unless indeed they contract with the Contractor for a supply, a measure I believe never yet fallen on. On the whole I give it as my opinion that the Pay Masters & Storekeepers at the several Posts ought to be allowed two Rations a day each, with Barrack room & fuel sufficient for there comfortable accomodation and that the Superintendants & Master Armourers should be entitled to the same allowances. Enclosed you have the Papers handed me to report on. With respect I esteem I am, Sir Your most Obedient Servant Samuel Hodgdon James M^cHenry Esq. Sec^y of War