ENCLOSURE: Clothing Pattens
Document 1798Advises on uniform coats not made to pattern.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[War department]
[Mr John Harris]
July 27. 1798
The Sect of War admits the reception of Artillerist Coats which are altered provided a Certificate is obtained from the Inspectors purporting that they are otherwise equal to Pattern —
Certificate enclosed
War department July 27. 1798.
Sir
I am informed that Mr Billington the Contractor for supplying of Clothing has in a number of the Coats intended for the Artillerists deviated from the pattern Article and that on account of the said deviation the said Coats have not been receipted for.
In order however that the Contractor may sustain as little loss as may be you are hereby permitted to receive and receipt for such Coats amounting as is said to the number of five hundred and fifty provided that the Inspectors shall be of opinion that in every other respect they are equal to the pattern articles, and shall so certify.
I am Sir
Your obed Servant
Jams McHenry
Mr John Harris
Sir July 26 1798
The Materials & Workmanship of the Artillery Coats being fully equal to the Pattern Coat: we are of opinion there ought not to be any Deduction made on account of the [undecipherable: probable reading Form], if that is approved of, as it does not appear to us that any advantage could accrue to the Contractor from the Deviation
We are respectfully Sir your obt servants
[Honorable
James McHenry Esq.
Secretary at War]
John Stelle
[undecipherable] Ewing
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Advises on uniform coats not made to pattern.
Date
07/26/1798
Author
Recipient
Document number
1798072640101
Page start
4
Note
Enclosed in McHenry to Harris, 07/27/1798.
Notable persons
James McHenry
multiple
John Steele
Thomas Ewing
Notable items
materials and workmanship
artillery coats
fully equal to the pattern coat
of opinion there ought not to be any deduction made on account of the form
it does not appear to us that any advantage could arrive to the contractor from the deviation
pattern
form

