Pay of Adjutants & Paymasters
Document 1798McHenry explains that the Act of Congress of 30 May 1794 makes no distinctions between the pay of adjutants and paymasters. Any officer of a battalion of artillery who does either of those duties is entitled to the same pay as an officer doing the same duties for a regiment.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (model sonnet 4.6). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
War Department 20 July 1798
Sir.
I have your letter before me respecting a doubt, whether an officer doing the duty of adjutant and paymaster, to a battalion in the corps of artillerist and Engineers under the act of 1794 organising that corps, is intitled to the pay & forage allowed by [undecipherable] to an officer in addition to his pay in the line, for doing such duty to a regiment.
And am of opinion, that as the act of the 30th of May 1796. To ascertain and fix the military establishment of the United States" places this corps upon the military establishment and in its provisions makes no distinction as to paymasters and adjutants, that the officers doing duty as such to Battalions of artillery, [undecipherable] be distinguished from, but must be considered intitled to the same pay and forage, as adjutants and paymasters to a regiment.
I am Sir
your most obt st
James McHenry
Mr William Simmons
Acct. Dept of War
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
McHenry explains that the Act of Congress of 30 May 1794 makes no distinctions between the pay of adjutants and paymasters. Any officer of a battalion of artillery who does either of those duties is entitled to the same pay as an officer doing the same duties for a regiment.
Date
07/20/1798
Author
Recipient
Sent from
War Department
Document number
1798072000101
Page start
1
Notable persons
William Simmons
James McHenry
Notable locations
War Department
War Department


