Questions Legality of Land Purchase and Judicial Power of Secretary of War
Document 1798Refers to correspondence with the Secretary of State and the Honorable David Morgan. Mentions survey of Virginia land and superintendent offices in Louisville in discussion of good land. The Secretary of War has announced the whole business illegal. Questions his judicial power.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Copy of
A remonstrance to the
Secretary, [undecipherable] and also an
Answer to Genl [undecipherable: Morgan's] caveat]
[undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] Feb 27: 1795
[undecipherable] [undecipherable] Attorney Secretary of [undecipherable]
[undecipherable]
Having obtained a copy of the caveat Allegations
or complaint or whatsoever it may be called which was lodg'd
with the [undecipherable] of [undecipherable] by the Honourable Daniel [undecipherable: Morgan]
[undecipherable] and others bearing date the [undecipherable] of November
1[7]94 and [undecipherable] has been since turned over to your offices
as containing matters cognizable [undecipherable] you in which it
is alledged that [undecipherable] Nathaniel [undecipherable: Massie] John
O'Bannon and [undecipherable] the [undecipherable] principal surveyor[s]
[undecipherable] the others his deputies for surveying Virginia Continental
lands on the north west side of the Ohio river had violat[ed]
their trust by [undecipherable] the arrangements entered into
[undecipherable] location of those lands and instead of
[undecipherable] and surveying the same [undecipherable]
[undecipherable]
[undecipherable] may [be] due to the said Richard [undecipherable] Anderson
[undecipherable] O'Bannon and [undecipherable]
their own right, or as [undecipherable] and finding that you
consider [undecipherable] authorised to [undecipherable] and entertain the
[undecipherable] caveat [undecipherable] and hence to [undecipherable] the
giving of patents on surveys belonging to either of the parties
complained of as aforesaid, [undecipherable] one of the parties and advis'd
[undecipherable] only to hear the complaint
on one side that you are also authorised to hear the
answers on the other, hence to decide, I shall proceed to
reply to the allegations aforesaid. In the first place
I positively deny the whole of the above statements —
In the next place to give you an idea of the business [undecipherable] give
the following [undecipherable] in the year 1784 a [undecipherable] of
m[a]de under the superintendance of the [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] determined that all the good land was taken on
the waters of [undecipherable] Cumberland river and that the
[undecipherable] on the warrants must be located on the [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] side of the river Ohio for this purpose [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] the office [undecipherable] first of August 1785 and ran in [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] notice was given in the Virginia Gazette on this
occasion a board of superintending officers again met
at Louisville and made arrangements for conducting
the business and locations were commenced and made
conformably to those arrangements till the whole number
of [undecipherable] warrants went through. The warrants return'd
by the surveyors after a certain day to be registered by him
as they were [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] were entitled to prior-
ity of location as they stood in the register which they received
[undecipherable] till the whole were completely gone through, after which
locations were made as the parties applied. Knowing this state-
ment [undecipherable] be accurate I am utterly at a loss to say on what
[undecipherable] information Gen. Morgan has grounded his complaint
But this I will say it is not well founded. That far from departing
[undecipherable] the arrangements made by the superintendents they have
been the rules which uniformly governed the transactions
in the offices having said this much to repel the complaint
and to enable you to understand the subject in general per-
mit me to remark that this business has been in execution
for above ten years that many locations to the amount of
many thousand acres stand on these arrangements and are
subject to be overturned if any regard is or can be paid
to such complaints as [undecipherable] I have just answered supposing
them to be for a moment to be founded, which however
I repeat are unfounded. Will the secretary of war under-
take to declare the whole business illegal and void
and therefore to be done over again; if he will not
undertake to do this which I can hardly suppose, [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] to what purpose tends [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
in principle [undecipherable] at the whole of the [undecipherable] done on the
north west side of the Ohio. Because it is obvious that if
one link of this chain of rotation is misplaced the whole
from thence forward deranged and to correct the error
with an impartial hand all transactions subsequent
to the first error must be set aside. Does the secretary at
war charge himself with this office and authority? [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] to what purpose does he restrain the giving of patents
upon a general allegation that the legal arrangements have
been [undecipherable] [undecipherable] operating only in particular
cases? If the secretary of war means to exercise judicial
power between man and man and not merely a ministerial power confined simply to enquiring whether the survey
[undecipherable] by the proper vouchers and if the party has [undecipherable]
the necessary [undecipherable] to entitle him to the land, then it becomes
of importance to those concerned to know the extent of this new
judicial authority and in what manner it is to be
exercised, whether on the principles of common [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] law or law martial? you will pardon my [undecipherable: solicitude]
on this subject since I must own that I have not been
able in all my researches to find the law which con-
stitutes the secretary of war a judicial court in [undecipherable]
matters of title or [undecipherable] damages between individuals,
nor am I apprised of the authority which enables him to
take cognizance of complaints which he cannot adjust.
But while I am necessitated to consider the secretary of war
as a ministerial officer merely and hence bound to examine
the claims of an individual to a patent according [undecipherable] the
evidence which he brings to sustain his right independent of all other claims I freely admit that the
man who had injured [an]other ought to be amenable
for his conduct before the proper tribunal.
I know also it would be the duty of the secretary of war
[undecipherable] of state to forbear to give a patent prohibited by [undecipherable]
tribunals which prohibition would of course [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] actions. In the present case I should even think a
Suspension of the grants of the subject of complaint
if there was a specific allegation of interference between
the claims of [undecipherable: Gen. Morgan], or any other person for whom he
undertakes to speak and that of Col. [undecipherable] Anderson
or any one of his deputies, but there is no such thing
it is not said by Gen Morgan that he has a right to
any one of the tracts of land claimed by any of the
[undecipherable] of whom he complains. If he had so alleged [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] of war is not the judge
[undecipherable] of right between the parties and that it does
not belong to him to refuse on [undecipherable] such allegation
it belongs to the judicial courts who are competent to
try the matter of right and to render justice by [undecipherable]
[undecipherable]. But a court would not entertain a [undecipherable] complaint
so vague as the one presented by Gen. Morgan unless it was really
[undecipherable] the locations and surveys which had been made
upon it, specifying that they had not been made according
to the arrangements of the superintendents. And here to
order the whole business to be done over again, for
any one who has an idea of equity and who admits the
parties complained of have gotten to themselves
the best lands as it is alleged and thus injured others
would think of compelling a conveyance of any one or
all of those good tracts to Genl Morgan and his friends
who cannot shew any specific right to them
but only claims to come in according to general arrange-
ments the effect of which cannot positively be known and
it is [undecipherable] throughout and which in that case
might not [undecipherable] one of Genl Morgan's claims
on either of those good tracts. If it were true
that the arrangements had been set aside
[strikethrough: alledged] alledged left by Genl Morgan whereby the claims
of others have fallen on those good lands it would not
follow if those locations were all declared void and the
Arrangements of the Superintendents set up again and [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] followed that these good tracts should fall to Genl [undecipherable: Morgan].
Would then a judge in Equity decree them to
him, when he has no specific right as [undecipherable] location was
in [undecipherable] of [undecipherable] arrangements [undecipherable] and from thence [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] by reason that he was entitled to
[undecipherable] lands? [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] also [undecipherable] that [undecipherable] knew of those good lands
that he ought to [undecipherable] them for him and that he was alone pre-
vented by [undecipherable] without them having passed out of turn by
[undecipherable] the effectual arrangements. Believing myself
[undecipherable] by the [undecipherable]
of war will [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
his powers before he proceeds to examine them and that in [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] of these ideas that it properly goes to entertain a complaint officially which he cannot redress, that he is not in [undecipherable]
of communication between [undecipherable] injured citizens and the judicial authority.
That no ministerial functions give him in this business a right to
examine the official documents transmitted by the surveyor
and compare them with those in his offices so far as to enable
him to certify that the party was entitled to the quantity of land
surveyed and that the title vouchers are good and that it does not
fall within the line of his duty to investigate adverse claims
and that which, properly should restrain him from the attempt
[undecipherable] will [undecipherable] him to [undecipherable] similar certificates on
[undecipherable] and if the surveys belong to those above
named come complete in due form and it shall appear that
the party under whom the claim could have obtained a patent in his
own name that his legal assigns ought to obtain it in every case
respectively. I am Sir dutifully Genl [undecipherable]
Nathl [undecipherable]
To the secretary of War Philad[elphia] 27 Jan[uary] 1795
Type
Autograph, Contemporaneous or Certified Copy, Signed
Description
Refers to correspondence with the Secretary of State and the Honorable David Morgan. Mentions survey of Virginia land and superintendent offices in Louisville in discussion of good land. The Secretary of War has announced the whole business illegal. Questions his judicial power.
Date
02/27/1798
Author
Recipient
Repository
Collection
Document number
1798022700001
Page start
1
Notable persons
James McHenry
Nathaniel Masser
Secretary of War
Secretary of State
Timothy Pickering
David Morgan
Mr. Gunderson
John O'Bannion
Mr. Lyttle
Surveyor
Richard Anderson
General Morgan
Anderson
Notable locations
Virginia
Louisville
Green River
Cumberland River
Ohio River

