Concerning fortifications and the defense of harbors
Document 1796McHenry reports on the state of fortifications in the United States and the sum expended on them since 1794. Suggests that Americans are uneasy about maintaining a large military establishment, but insists that fortifications are absolutely essential to the defense of the United States.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
Sir
[In]dependence
I have the honour to submit [strikethrough: ]
In compliance with the request of
the [strikethrough: Committee], the following [strikethrough: statements]
exhibits
and Observations relative to
"The Committee [strikethrough: ] have wished
to know [strikethrough: ] the actual state of
the several fortifications in the U.S. and
what the amount of the sums expended
upon them respectively since the 1st day
of March 1794"
[strikethrough: it not [undecipherable] [undecipherable] than the
[undecipherable] the general [undecipherable] the Secretary of
[War] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] and [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] or [undecipherable] of them respectively
[undecipherable] [several] states [where]
have been undertaken a furnished since the year 1794
for the defence of our own harbours
or such a depth to [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
if [we] [neglected] [undecipherable] I think [undecipherable] might
be attended with any inconvenience or
danger, I shall [undecipherable] confine myself to the [undecipherable] amount
[given] of them by [other] [acts] [regards] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] [undecipherable]
my predecessor in his report to Congress [as]
dated the 1795, there have been expended [and what amounts]
the appropriations [to] [any] purpose
either to [from] [undecipherable] the defence [undecipherable] described]
The utility of securing as far as
by adequate fortifications harbours &
practicable [strikethrough: by fortifications] our sea-board from
[strikethrough: [undecipherable] fortifications] may be considered as a [strikethrough: point]
wind and invasion [strikethrough: appears to have been]
to acquire has been assigned by [strikethrough: the] and
established
confirmed by the repeated [strikethrough: acts] Laws and appro.
-priation made by Congress for the purpose
A nation [strikethrough: which] must his [undecipherable] ambitious [projects]
[strikethrough: [undecipherable]] country [which] lays it down as
an axiom, to avoid engaging in offensive [strikethrough: wars]
and [strikethrough: confine] its military [strikethrough: preparations] to the [strikethrough: defensive]
measures of defence, must pay particularly
attention to strengthen its [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] pointers by strong and well
combined fortifications:
Each fortification on our [strikethrough: sea]
coast
becomes to [strikethrough: the] militia, a point of support
which and [thus] defended by the regular troops
[take] it becomes to the militia a ground of support
Sir
I have the honour to submit, in compliance
with the request contained in your letter dated
the [blank] [January?] ult, the following exhibits and
observations relative to the "actual state of
the several fortifications in the U.S. and the
sums expended upon them respectively since the
first day of March 1794.
As a detailed or particular develop-
ment of the several works which have been under-
Taken or finished since the year 1794, for the
defence of our harbours, were it made public,
might be attended with some inconvenience or
danger, I shall therefore confine myself to such general
notices respecting their present state as appear to
[strikethrough: within the] object of [undecipherable: intended] of the requisition of
the Committee.
The utility of securing our harbours and
sea board from insults and invasion, as far as prac-
ticable by adequate fortifications may be [con-]
sidered as a point established by the repeated
Laws and appropriations made by Congress for
the purpose.
A [strikethrough: Country] which renounces ambitious
[projects] and [strikethrough: which] [undecipherable] [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] sea-board [undecipherable] [exposed] [to invasion]
[undecipherable] [strikethrough: would] render [strikethrough: the] maintenance of a
large military establishment unnecessary
[strikethrough: and] [strikethrough: must be to]
and at the same time which and at the same
time [strikethrough: by] [undecipherable] [strikethrough: other nations,] must
supply the place, by [enabling] a [strikethrough: means of]
means of a system [strikethrough: upon its frontiers]
[of] strong and well connected
fortifications, which may be defended by a small
force, and become points of support to its militia
To a [strikethrough: nation] which renounces all views
of Conquest and ambition [strikethrough: well connected chain]
[strikethrough: the defence of it upon its]
sea board and frontiers is indispensable to
[strikethrough: its] safety. Such a system may [strikethrough: also] be
while it enables a small force to defend a
great extent of Country
The actual position of the U.S. [undecipherable]
To [points] in a particular manner to fortifications
as an important [strikethrough: mean]
[undecipherable] of defeme.
To a nation which renounces, all ambitious [strikethrough: [undecipherable]]
and [strikethrough: desires] and yet is exposed to
The actual position and policy of the
U.S. considered
[if] we consider it to be the policy of
the U.S. to engage in no wars of conquest, and [but] to
confine her
[This] is to be offered, [by] a [strikethrough: strong]
[strikethrough: upon] sea board [strikethrough: of] [strikethrough: frontiers]
and well connected chain of fortifications, [on]
small military [strikethrough: base]
establishment and a [strikethrough: large]
[strikethrough: organized] militia [which can be] promptly brought
to its support.
I consider it among the
[strikethrough: Duties] of primary obligations upon [strikethrough: a nation]
is to secure the integrity of its [territory]. [It] it ought to
be [sought] [as] a chief object [with] a chief government
to give to [the] means provided for [that] [strikethrough: and see all those]
the perfection of which [they] are susceptible.
Two powerful motives most [requiring]
a special and marked attention to [our] forti-
:fications. [The] fortifications [are] [strikethrough: one capable of the spending of]
providing against invasion, the other, the
protection of our [ships] naval force &
the magazines which its maintenance
[requires].
Type
Autograph Draft Letter
Description
McHenry reports on the state of fortifications in the United States and the sum expended on them since 1794. Suggests that Americans are uneasy about maintaining a large military establishment, but insists that fortifications are absolutely essential to the defense of the United States.
Date
1796
Author
Repository
Collection
Document number
1797999900601
Page start
1
Notable persons
James McHenry
Congress
military
committee
militia
navy
Notable locations
Seaboard
Notable items
Fortifications
garrisons
forts
posts
harbors
laws
appropriations

