Properly maintaining coastal garrisons
Document 1797Inquires on the numbers of troops needed in order to properly defend coastal forts and garrisons in the event of an invasion. McHenry asks what the House plans to do in order to adequately provide this need; he also seriously questions the ability of a voluntarily militia to do the job.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
Memorandum
of facts for
Cou Smith.
1797.
As we know the number of forts on the sea-board and having [undecipherable] the number of men which may be employed in garrisoning them, we can calculate [undecipherable]
[strikethrough: undecipherable lines]
Can that number keep them in repair? Can they afford the necessary military guards and [reliefs?]
[margin: Can May / 12.]
for the cannon and public property subject to [undecipherable]? Is it [undecipherable] not; but if I am mistaken there are military gentlemen in the house who can set me right.
Again if we add the proposed 10 companies to N° 498 the force divided [undecipherable] among the [several?] forts, will [come?] about [undecipherable] to each. Let me be answered by military gentlemen whether even this number will be sufficient to keep them in repair much less to man them [properly?] in case of danger or invasion?
But suppose a [undecipherable] distribution [undecipherable] and let the harbours most important and most [exposed?] [undecipherable] cent. Let us take for example [undecipherable] many? Charleston — a harbor [of?] [undecipherable] — most [Second?] [undecipherable] New York and New Port. Could [they?] be [assorted?] to the 3 forts from [undecipherable] [five?] hundred or [undecipherable] each containing [more?] than 800, this [undecipherable] would leave, [say?] about $[undecipherable], for all the other forts on the sea board.
Let gentlemen reflect upon the state of the southern [undecipherable] of the union. Let them consider how far it is removed from [the?] Government; and if the [undecipherable] of a [undecipherable] we can expect a [undecipherable] to be formed of the wisdom of a [undecipherable] experience before succour can reach it. The
[strikethrough: undecipherable lines at top of page]
It has been suggested by a gentleman from [Maryland?], that they may suffer [undecipherable] in repair [undecipherable]
[strikethrough: undecipherable lines]
[to repair?] [undecipherable] work or doing duty in them as infantry is [undecipherable] of any [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] peace [undecipherable] it must be voluntary. Can it be the intention of [gentlemen?] to depend on the voluntary [undecipherable] of [militia?] to keep the forts in repair and [undecipherable]
— Can we [undecipherable] doubt that in time of danger the [militia?] of the sea ports [undecipherable]
[margin: my [Doubts?]]
[undecipherable] show [undecipherable] elasticity and spirit in their defense; but it is more than upon [undecipherable] that these forts should be [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] called upon [undecipherable] not [undecipherable] be [undecipherable] with [undecipherable] in a state of order & [undecipherable] [undecipherable] incapable of defense. The [undecipherable] of [undecipherable] by being far completed and of their being [undecipherable] by [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] of that man's [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] can we expect a [sufficiently?] correct estimate to be formed of the wisdom of a nation [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] to [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] from Government
forts at such distant points ought to be [undecipherable]
at least
[undecipherable] capable to [hold?] an enemy at bay [undecipherable] information [undecipherable] whether or [undecipherable] [undecipherable] could be [succeeded?] [undecipherable] the militia or [undecipherable] detachments from the neighbouring forts.
It will I believe be impossible to resist [acknowledging?] of this truth when the [opposed?] [situation?] of [peace?] the [capabilities?] of [undecipherable] [undecipherable] examined [relatively?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] colonies and governments of the [undecipherable].
Type
Draft Document
Description
Inquires on the numbers of troops needed in order to properly defend coastal forts and garrisons in the event of an invasion. McHenry asks what the House plans to do in order to adequately provide this need; he also seriously questions the ability of a voluntarily militia to do the job.
Date
1797
Author
Recipient
Repository
Collection
Document number
1797999900501
Page start
1
Notable persons
James McHenry
William Smith
troops
guards
companies
House of Representatives
militia
insurgents
infantry
Notable locations
Seaboard
harbors
Savannah
Charleston
Wilmington
Norfolk
South
Maryland
ports
Notable items
Garrison
fort
cannon
posts
fortress
artillery
detachment

