Military strategy on the Mississippi
Document 1797Pickering gives a blistering critique of the proposal by some to attack the ports of St. Louis and New Madrid, arguing that it is folly to go on the offensive. Pickering insists that if hostilities were to commence on the Mississippi, it would best to send the greatest force possible to that quarter. If American troops were thinly spread in ports across the Mississippi, Pickering argues, the force would be much weaker.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Free
T. Pickering]
James Mc Henry Esqr
Downing's Town
Pennsylvania
[L...nng Pickering L...ry
[undecipherable: 25 Aug?] 1797]
---
Trenton Oct. 25. 1797
Dr Sir. 14
Last evening I received your letter of the 22d, with an open packet for the President, which I have read, feled, and shall this day forward.
Can the cautious restriction of Powers — the preposterous idea of taking the posts of St Louis, Genevieve & New-Madrid — be accounted for, except on the principle that they may cover sinister views, the conspiracy of which prompts × × × × to over-act his part? But if hostilities were to commence on the Mis-sissipi, why not collect the utmost force to that quarter? Why the zeal to attack — & the contradictory measure of lessening the force he could command, by remanding a company where it was not needed?
His construction of Rivets letter is probably just. But if the poor missionary has two years salary in arrear, it would seem advisable to pay him at least one, immediately. What is [undecipherable] of the other priest? Janin? I thought both had gone to the Spaniard. Will not the retaining of his pay, furnish an excuse for unfaithfulness & desertion? And with the influence he has acquired over the Indians, may not his desertion hazard mischief? — Doubtless it had been better than we had never given either. By the overtures of Q. it is clear that he belongs to the nation of fries & intrigues.
I return Mr Hindman's letter, & thank you for the perusal. But how astonishing that at this time Youngsburg should increase! Surely the people want information.
Adieu! T. Pickering
James McHenry Esqre
Type
Copy of Signed Document
Description
Pickering gives a blistering critique of the proposal by some to attack the ports of St. Louis and New Madrid, arguing that it is folly to go on the offensive. Pickering insists that if hostilities were to commence on the Mississippi, it would best to send the greatest force possible to that quarter. If American troops were thinly spread in ports across the Mississippi, Pickering argues, the force would be much weaker.
Date
10/25/1797
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Trenton
Repository
Collection
Document number
1797102540101
Page start
1
Notable persons
James McHenry
Timothy Pickering
John Adams
William Hindman
French
Spanish
military
Notable locations
Downingstown
Trenton
St. Louis
New Madrid
France
Spain
Notable items
Ports

