Discussion of International Affairs
Document 1797Response to request. Mentions peace efforts and treaties. Expresses opinions about US action.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Page 1 is wholly illegible per archival notation]
la Haye 7. Decr 1797
No.3 17
My dear Sir,
At length in an answer of old books to [undecipherable] peck'd at a Request to Repeat the manner for you & me [undecipherable]. I am looking out for [Almonds?] on the rights of neutral nations & indeed I got. It will send also to you I fear as [hurting?] as to [foretell?] some. But none hence as exception line from Mr. [Wolcott?] a two letters from [Col.?] [undecipherable] Others not mentioned any things from America. If [France?] would deal with his books, papers & [bind?] each [undecipherable] to Mr. [Hammond?] a [Store?] Shop Dresse No.6 I am able and [put?] themen an way to [your?] post in Holland a [come?] to attentively [declined?] sometimes upon the State of things [undecipherable]. [Addy?] would give this [rights?] soft for late [hasten?] Address. His [Spencer?] word from that [selling?] will be done by [experience?] that this been out your [appreciation?] with Christ. I [undecipherable] around of the folly & wickedness of any man that that [undecipherable] to the mind. [Cl?] but I am certain that [Birth?] guiled my [undecipherable] to its display — the [Representation?] about an instance [Hall?] production in its display —
A weak nation must come a role as [separate?] — although me and not [always?] — a nation supposed to be limited must give a testimony of its [limited?] by those great [Preparatory?] means some which never would be taken unless the Country was united — Reparation must be the evidence that we are united — ...[undecipherable] a fact or an act [branch?] — [involving?] France has become [spec?] — First is nothing British [citizens?] — [nearly?] to slander while she produces this end — Thirdly to produce continually dissension — what she may [put?] and may post has an independent government as she has the [hundred?] Republics. France as [Oceanic?] — be where she has [candidated?] [undecipherable] this is — the means of forcing it to form of Polish concerns. Its [tasks?] have not existed the [title?] expert majority [philosophy?] to [undecipherable] making East & [Thing?] while beg to the breach bringing of in the party things to appoint the proportions, the interest to see the completion of the grand Scheme — a system of [undecipherable] means are [complying?] in the U.S. in which the [aimed?] mostly else the grand she could in [undecipherable] cannot avoid these thus under
[Page 4 is largely illegible — undecipherable throughout due to scan quality and ink degradation]
[undecipherable] and [profusion?] else, you had but to [let?] it see — an edition has [determined?] to be [shown?], especially if the [undecipherable] [?] allow [attention?], and if an man [?] that you [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] Card [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] of [Penn?] [between?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] you are [laying?] good. [hope?] me [enough?] the [?] [?] & [Purpose?] is not [?] there at the [trunk?] & the [holdings?] ... [undecipherable] [undecipherable] at the many them [here?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] those [?] the there — [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] I have [found?] would add [don't?] & the [undecipherable] [?] [?] of [?] — allegiance and [the past?] [?] to [?] [?] Ah [finding?] [Store?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [?] to [?] [act?] [as?] [?] [?] [undecipherable] [?] [undecipherable] [?] all my [?] — [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [would?] additional [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [?] [?] [?] [there?] [from?] [have?] at [undecipherable] [?] [?] [?] — [undecipherable] [undecipherable] then [they?] [shall?] [have?] been those than [?] at [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] the [professions?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] — [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] [?] — But they have an [home?] of the King of [?] [until?] they —
for their own country through our [inviting?] methods — a dismission, those mean side of any good into a fear — [you're?] something like Justice. [Militia?] an span [celebrity?] kept in Rome. The army of the Danube [?] Drang is in the vicinity of the capital did is adopted [?] with the Decree against the large Cuts — Depend upon it that almost country — just enfold at the Boundary which satisfaction [documented?] the branches [?] of confiscated elements; [dispatched?] national dimes — [?] with too little patriots would as advance Republicanism on the [?] in both, as a they battle it, but [prosable?] after thing was related to the most [parsing?] pounds of [Oregon?] — definition of a small — a scheme of [patterns?] more [specificies?] at the same time [you're?] this here, now [endearing?] to the end of any man who has paid [aroused?] — tries a series of chances on the mind, I [would?] upon the demand of the [phasing?] [additional?] the [Aftertopic?]. I remember a thing over [Butler?] like [?] put to helpfully [document?] — in offer handled after description for this not selling from its wailing eyes, it is impossible to be here at the [belatedly?] facing — In Theorem it's a capacity with [empathy?] the contradiction that the break would [build?] [betraying?] thing this to found general political matters. But that it had been had for him — of they expect it to narrow in the day of [hell?], the Ranks [like?] there they — That they expect other wells — Some of their last ones and the but often this — a reason united a political [definition?] — by a [Brimstone?] city really and trying has repeated the [helpers?] issues I even — another quite put — only and need this — here I am this [Blame?] said — to Binding Plan in [undecipherable] by found national about would assist the early of this — [undecipherable] in the well based [stayed?] [undecipherable] — I mean strong must [undecipherable] that they have an home of the King of [undecipherable] until they —
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Response to request. Mentions peace efforts and treaties. Expresses opinions about US action.
Date
08/07/1797
Author
Recipient
Repository
Collection
Document number
1797080740101
Page start
1
Note
Parts are illegible.
Notable persons
James McHenry
William Van Murray
Mr. Wolcott
Notable locations
The Hague
French
London
Portugal

