Deposition of James Humphreys
Document 1797Discussed employment of Humphreys by John Connor in "speculating in soldiers rights." Forgery of powers of attorney discussed.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[To Humphreys
[undecipherable] action]
Personally appeared James Humphreys of the Northern Liberties [undecipherable] who being duly sworn deposeth and faith that about two Years since [undecipherable] John Connor took occasion by coming with him [undecipherable] to [undecipherable] to the War Department [undecipherable] and there which would be with [undecipherable] to [undecipherable] — that he asked if what and Connor amounted to he had been [undecipherable] in Soldiers Rights. Deponent [undecipherable] him (the Deponent) if he would transact the [undecipherable] at the Office — to which he [undecipherable] not knowing it [undecipherable] — that they went accordingly to the Chief Clerk, which [undecipherable] that Deponent's [undecipherable] former and John Shannon went to Carlisle for the [undecipherable] in their [undecipherable] of getting powers of Attorney and returned in about two Weeks with a considerable Number of Powers of Attorney that some of them were filled up, but many had only the Magistrates Signature and Official Clerk affixed to them —
That several of those were attested by Hugh McAllister of Carlisle —
That the said Connor and Shannon at the House of said Shannon, filled up from the [undecipherable] Letters of Attorney and affixed the Deponent's Name — to (as he [undecipherable] to be) the Attorney and also affixed [undecipherable] the Names of the Soldiers — That most of those which he attests to [undecipherable] Hugh McAllister had been filled up and the Magistrates attestation already having been [undecipherable] and that the Witnesses to the attestation attested only to [undecipherable] — [undecipherable] McAllister was also [undecipherable] to be [undecipherable] Powers of Attorney at their [undecipherable] —
That the [undecipherable] only [undecipherable] with [undecipherable] of [undecipherable] Shannon — that this Deponent [undecipherable] — the [undecipherable] with [undecipherable] forged Powers of Attorney, one of them purporting [undecipherable] — went into the [undecipherable] of the Treasury and received Certificates for the Monies due to the [undecipherable] Soldiers —
The Name of the [undecipherable] Soldiers [undecipherable] one in the Name of [undecipherable] [undecipherable] for [undecipherable] 80 Dollars 59 [undecipherable], and the other [undecipherable] Name of [undecipherable] [undecipherable] for [undecipherable] 65 Dollars — a like of them bearing date 6 Sept 1796 — That a few Days after [undecipherable] this Deponent being concerned [undecipherable] of the [undecipherable] Certificates being found [undecipherable] — [undecipherable] communicate [undecipherable] which [undecipherable] Requested this Deponent complied with — that [undecipherable] being [undecipherable] McAllister, this Deponent complied with — that [undecipherable] examining the Powers of Attorney being forged — that McAllister seemed from him to be [undecipherable] —
That he let McAllister know that he (McAllister) [undecipherable] examining the Powers of Attorney — that this Deponent [undecipherable] use McAllister's [undecipherable] expressing [undecipherable] (Shannon?) [undecipherable] took [undecipherable] Powers of Attorney [undecipherable] caused this Deponent [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] — the [undecipherable] Letters of Attorney [undecipherable] — those for the Soldiers [undecipherable] thereupon the Certificates [undecipherable] to be [undecipherable] and genuine and that [undecipherable] McAllister [undecipherable], was [undecipherable] the own Witness to the Deponent [undecipherable] who [undecipherable] [undecipherable] — in [undecipherable] Day [undecipherable] Hugh McAllister, [undecipherable] — Shannon [undecipherable] as [undecipherable] Deponent
That [undecipherable] as Shannon [undecipherable] of this Deponent [undecipherable] took Powers of Attorney [undecipherable] to [undecipherable] in the [undecipherable] Soldiers Names thereto and McAllister [undecipherable] no Notarial Seal, which he brought with him from Carlisle for the Purpose of [undecipherable] Powers of Attorney for [undecipherable] Shannon and that [undecipherable] of the [undecipherable] Powers in the [undecipherable]
That some short time before he came into the Business within mentioned he with a [undecipherable] Powers of Attorney from John Connor [undecipherable] to [undecipherable] (in the Soldiers Names) which would be in the Treasury for [undecipherable] [undecipherable] the [undecipherable] Soldiers, which in return of another Power [undecipherable] granted by Connor he paid [undecipherable] and transferred and [undecipherable] 60 or 70 Dollars [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] he [undecipherable] to the [undecipherable] Connor and Shannon gave him for the money, which he attended to this — at Shannon's House — That when the Money was [undecipherable] and the [undecipherable] in Shannon's House, Shannon counted [undecipherable] one Third and [undecipherable] it by Mr Hardman, Clerk in the Register Office in [undecipherable] [undecipherable] Limited Hours — The remaining [undecipherable] from the [undecipherable] of the Department — John and Shannon [undecipherable] [undecipherable] of the Department — [undecipherable] John [undecipherable] of the Department — [undecipherable] only $[undecipherable] Dollars for his [undecipherable] — That the Deponent asked [undecipherable] of Shannon why Mr [undecipherable] did not [undecipherable] [undecipherable] the Money, [undecipherable] he must have it, he [undecipherable] as the [undecipherable] and he can not do without him —
This Witness says James Hardman or Company with either Shannon or Connor first [undecipherable] Shannon's [undecipherable] times to one [undecipherable] Hard [undecipherable] — and [undecipherable] that on the day on which he received the two Certificates within mentioned Shannon told him whether he had received them — and he [undecipherable] he had not, but the next morning Shannon told [undecipherable] [undecipherable] had received the [undecipherable] — Mr Hardman has [undecipherable] and that the Witness further recollects that [undecipherable] Connor & Shannon [undecipherable] [undecipherable] up [undecipherable] two Powers of Attorney to [undecipherable] to the [undecipherable] — and [undecipherable] they were [undecipherable] [undecipherable] Dead [undecipherable] — And this [undecipherable] — that he did not know the Hand writing, but from Shannon [undecipherable] him he was His [undecipherable] — that Connor [undecipherable] he had been [undecipherable] a [undecipherable] with the [undecipherable] man who did any [undecipherable] for him —
That [undecipherable] about or some short time [undecipherable] the [undecipherable] Transactions [undecipherable] from Connor brought him [undecipherable] Powers of Attorney and [undecipherable] Number of [undecipherable] [undecipherable] to him to [undecipherable] same to the War Office, where they [undecipherable] were [undecipherable] not genuine and therefore detained. That he informed Connor & Shannon thereof who [undecipherable] to Mr McAllister, by whom those of [undecipherable] Powers were attested — McAllister [undecipherable] to the War Office, inferring [undecipherable] the [undecipherable] Powers were genuine and [undecipherable] him affirmed, this Deponent received the [undecipherable] Warrants — That McAllister was in Town when this Deponent obtained the [undecipherable] Warrants — That Connor, Shannon & McAllister [undecipherable] at Ellisbie — in [undecipherable] that when McAllister, [undecipherable] — and [undecipherable] witnessed the [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] at Ellisbie — Mr McAllister [undecipherable] Connor & Shannon [undecipherable] there — and this Deponent [undecipherable] one, while he [undecipherable] Connor for [undecipherable] $[undecipherable] Dollars —
This Deponent further [undecipherable] that he [undecipherable] Connor [undecipherable] a [undecipherable] Clerk in the War Office [undecipherable] the Name of [undecipherable] and [undecipherable] Connor gave [undecipherable] for his [undecipherable] in Shannon's [undecipherable] on [undecipherable] when [undecipherable] and Connor he was going to [undecipherable] — "all is right." That Connor went to [undecipherable] at the [undecipherable] (after Scott had [undecipherable] the War Office) for the Purpose, as Connor said, of getting Soldiers Names from him — and that Connor on his Return had [undecipherable] Names — And this Deponent also heard of John Schaffer divers times that he obtained Names of Soldiers from the War Office through Scott and that he had paid Scott [undecipherable] Sums of Money for Soldiers Names — And from Connor this Witness understands that Scott was to have, at his option, either certain Sums for every Soldiers Name which he furnished or a certain Proportion of the [undecipherable] of the [undecipherable] Warrants —
Sworn to and Subscribed
3d August 1797 — before me
Hilary Baker
Mayor
and in the presence of
[undecipherable: Jno Simmons?]
James Humphreys
Type
Document Signed
Description
Discussed employment of Humphreys by John Connor in "speculating in soldiers rights." Forgery of powers of attorney discussed.
Date
08/03/1797
Author
Document number
1797080390001
Page start
1
Notable persons
James Humphreys
Hilary Baker
William Simmons
John Connor
John Shannon
Hugh McAlister
Willet Carman
Isaac Ford
Mr. Steele
Mr. Riddle
William Elliott
Mr. Hindman
soldiers
Scott, a clerk in the War Department
John Schaffer
Notable locations
Northern Liberties
Carlisle
4th Street
Frigate
Notable items
deposition
speculation
Soldier's Rights
powers of attorney
monies
horse hire
expenses
land warrants

