Discussion of International Affairs
Document 1797Discussion of international affairs and different types of governments. Mentions treaties, sovereignty, indivisibility, etc. Refers to people and locations and various military and political campaigns.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
] — The [William?] of [N.?] [P?] [about?] [M's?], Capt [Bailey?] [going?] to [Bremm?] [door?] [attached?] & and and [L'Orient?] by the [Princeton?] [Eagle?] said & [belongs?] & [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] — [can?] in Paris, the [age?] of the [two?] [life?] a [Signal?] — The [Present?] [unload?] [found?] to [undecipherable?] [when?] a [Signal?] also [belonging?] & [ship?] [have?] The [years?] [ending?] of [Night?] [ship?] [trade?] — only in [nearly?] — [Catherine?] of [Star?]: they [had?] only by [sleep?] [tending?] where I [found?] from France [Champlin?] with them [drifted?], [Jopson?] [Handerson?] — [Gibson?] [found?] for [Portland?]... them [undecipherable?] a [ended?] — They take our ships they say because they have [no?] [etc?] [I?] [carrying?] of [letter?] [part?] of the ocean, [if?] of [bridging?] [side?] [not?] the, [understands?] with the [Subject?] [noun?] — The [possibility?] is then [undecipherable?] in different [format?] — but the ancient [though?] [sometimes?] [production?] of [appearances?] of [matters?] in [abundance?] [for?] it is [painful?] of a [silence?] & [distinct?] — to [write?] [from?] — a [attached?] [situation?] in [some?] [general?] [mind?] of [this?] [formed?] [undecipherable?]. [Work?] on the [planned?] [position?] of France, [Pitched?] and by her own [roads?], a [Cherish?] herself from the [poverty?] of all [according?] [discouraging?] the [Missions?] of the [base?] of [obtaining?] any [independent?] [orders?] [undecipherable?] [a?] to [undecipherable?] — Nothing can be said to such a nation [that?] this [great?] and [Sunday?] for [Rome?] with you but we can [inside?] [inform?] you if you [side?] [inform?] us of & then [indeed?] [undecipherable?] — to [support?] this [old?] defensive [language?] — [nothing?] else can [tell?]
[undecipherable?] [like?] [Dominion?], [put?] a [thing?] of [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] and [endeavored?] on [by?] [those?] among the [others?] [along?] [their?] [through?] [them?] — to [pull?] the [taking?] of [things?] [playing?] from [this?] [infamous?] [undecipherable?] by [entirely?] to [form?] the [actions?] [when?] and the [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] of [government?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [by?] [Military?] in their [character?] — [undecipherable?] and to be [undecipherable?] [friends?], [military?] — In [any?] things the [former?] [wherever?] [necessary?] as the [accessibly?] [corruption?] of a [Particular?] [undecipherable?] [have?] I [dare?] [compare?] to him and him [prepared?] them for a [bitter?] [number?] [the?] that [cloud?] [reached?] [stopping?] [along?] [taking?] [orders?] of [German?] [character?] — [compact?] a [duty?] [organization?] — for [antition?] to [Human?] [late?] [better?] [each?] [shout?] [body?] [undecipherable?] [necessarily?] to [defend?] a [Tyranny?] to be [imposed?] & [influence?] [allies?]. I [early?] and [allow?] a French army [is?] or an [influence?] has [got?], or [known?] from [somewhere?] the [people?] — on [days?] — when the [towns?] as [some?] [country?] the [people?] are [deceived?] [Rome?] is [within?] these [enemies?] — those in these [armies?] and their — — three in [consequence?] instead of [productivity?] [about?] the next [Philanthropist?] has [young?], a [not?] else then [your?] [same?] I [believe?] [would?] [ruin?] [you?] then — [quite?] [some?] [future?] of [local?] [Industry?] & to [Europe?], [side?] the [Total?] [over?] them... even the [Feudal?] [System?] to [the?] [last?] [mankind?] [confined?] — for it [meant?] [Democratic?] [place?] [They?] [Despotism?], [setting?] our [people?] have [lost?] the [should?] [lower?] in of the [Feudal?] [times?] [nothing?] but the [fear?] of a [private?] [influence?] has [prevented?] them from [selling?] a [French?] [People?] to join [for?] their [undecipherable?] [attack?] [when?] [Particularly?] [this?] [far?] [home?] [side?] [Sadly?] [Portugal?], [Spain?] — [it?] [ungaged?] & at [hoped?] [diplomatic?] [corps?] of Europe & all [influence?] [orders?] [France?] — There is a [fact?] that almost the [whole?] of the diplomatic corps in [Europe?] [has?] [informed?] orders. I mean as such as [bondsmen?] [charge?] [de-affaires?] — a man [who?] [am?] an [undecipherable?] the [apparent?] man so [play?] [undecipherable?]) to [work?] the [bureau?] of [affairs?]. [are?] to — this is the case [than?] they [belong?] & the [Persecution?] & a [Persecution?] [himself?] [long?] man of [influence?] seems to be [embarrassing?] to [organize?] an [ability?] [young?] all the [possible?] [contingencies?] a [changes?] on a [captain?] [undecipherable?], [book?] of [firm?] him [father?] [looking?] of all men, that some [vast?] [change?] in [human?] [affairs?] is [undecipherable?]
[not?] for [difficult?] [undecipherable?] in the [amount?] of [having?] [some?] [undecipherable?] [furthering?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] inside [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] — This [importance?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [governed?] by [the?] [many?] that [them?] [help?] if [both?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [regarded?] as [suspicious?], a [novel?] instead of [gaining?], [have?] that [good?] by [undecipherable?] [the?] [membership?] [a?] [hundred?] thoughts of them [undecipherable?]. [which?] [moved?] the [undecipherable?] of [un-done?] [undecipherable?] that [time?] — If the [continues?] as [she?] has [gone?] on [undecipherable?] a great [noise?] must [come?] about it [under?] [military?] [undecipherable?] — If the [put?] and [order?] [undecipherable?] [of?] the [revolution?] [undecipherable?] of their [undecipherable?] — [the?] [insubordination?] [entering?] [into?] [50%?] — [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [all?] otherwise [nothing?] [undecipherable?] — [A?] there is [nothing?] like a [seed?] [found?] on — They [burn?] all of [Them?] more than they [right?]. France [above?] [anything?] [imagined?] — but them [love?] is [connected?] of the [Monarch?] various [directions?] of [July?] [reduction?] [partly?] [money?] — have been [successfully?] [good?] [information?] it is [possible?] that the [majority?] of that [action?] an [head?] with the new [Theory?] of the [politicians?] — I [went?] for a [third?] as it [could?] and [accomplished?] of the [Roman?] [de?] [Conder?] as the [Duke?] of [Orleans?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [partly?] from — now [brought?] and [administrative?] [undecipherable?] — The [Doctrine?] [would?] [catch?] out the [last?] [Thanks?] are now [getting?] [had?] once [enough?] [though?] [contrary?] to the little [let?] [on?] from [embarrassing?] to [serve?] the [people?] of Paris, for the [nations?] has [also?] or [nothing?] to do with [holiday?], on the [story?] of the [Danger?] [undecipherable?] from the [voyagers?] — This [shape?] is [rightly?] them, a [party?] [stung?] & [partly?] behind, This [affairs?] is [in?] [address?], all [lacks?] of [spare?] [times?] [names?] [undecipherable?]
The embarkation of 18,000 [Batf?] [forces?] — [bruited?] on [board?] [undecipherable?] of a [Government?] [is?] it. It has been [kept?] [within?] the [Texel?] a [long?] time [by?] a [camp?] [just?] [British?] ships at [anchor?], have [averted?] [more?] to [Speculation?]. [Approximately?] [undecipherable?] [could?] & if the [other?] day from [the?] [there?] [clear?] for [contingent?] [Reserve?]
[The?] [earliest?] [ship?] in a [raid?] [effort?] I [am?] as [matter?] of — [there?] [can?] have [—?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [them?] [after?] [himself?] against the [like?] & a [class?] [undecipherable?] — two very [saying?] only little in a [truly?] [Thought?] of the [British?] [national?] [every?] one and [undecipherable?] with the French [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] — but [that?] then [can?] [out?] to the [King?] of [Persia?] would [have?] [because?] it has an army of 30,000 [very?] from [that?] there they are [imagination?] to [this?] for an [form?] of G. [Berlin?] — [probably?] [authorized?] [undecipherable?] — [that?] to be the [trusted?] [numbers?] in an [employment?] [would?] of [dance?], [spend?] the army [gives?] — [Could?] [help?] on her [road?] and [board?] the army — [Lose?] [Mauritania?] also have in [trouble?] [People?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] [not?] them any [other?] — [is?] any man [so?] it has [enough?] to them [undecipherable?] — to get a [Low?] [Georges?] at all [battle?] — on a [kept?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?] speak to you are the [Conditions?] — the American [Hostel?] — a [minister?] I am [undecipherable?] — to [have?] [last?]. It [undecipherable?] me the [Banders?], the [mistaken?] there [one?] has the [view?] of it in this [walk?]. [Clue?] on their [poor?] [families?]. But the [time?] to be [known?] to [many?] to know if they [had?] a [prospect?] of [selling?] [out?] a [a?] [Domini?] They [answered?] they had [never?] [had?] [ordered?] — a [tale?] about [head?] [which?] I [heard?] [undecipherable?]
— a [office?] from the [subject?] I [had?] [land?] of [now?] [interest?] of [until?] — with his [husband?] too [in?] they [must?] & [helping?] it is [and?] I [however?] from the [Committee?] for the [door?] [over?] — [entirely?] at the [most?] [completely?] of [undecipherable?] — that they had an [original?] [authority?] that [withered?] to [come?] & [certain?] [plans?] for the [keeping?] [up?] of the [house?] [its?] [foundations?] and [undecipherable?] as they [wicked?] to [put?] it in [again?] — I [had?] [previously?] [told?] them that I [intended?] to [repair?] the [rooms?] & I [should?] [our?] at any [our?] [expense?] — that all of I could [request?] of them [was?] [such?] a [repair?] as they had [given?] it [nearly?] & [between?] the [house?] — The [said?] he [could?] [do?] it [?] [couldn't?] but that they had been in the habit of going it [occasional?] [expense?] as [changed?] them & I [made?] to — & to [down?] every [end?] — & to do [place?] a [plenty?] of the [house?] — that I [caught?] [divide?] the [returns?] — with the [Gov't?] [upon?] the [principle?] that I [would?] [long?] from [also?] [expense?] [except?] [such?] as they [considered?] as [absolute?] — & the [measurement?] — the [binding?] them [rented?] an in this [country?] for — [Surely?] the [loss?] over the [out?] [roof?], [painting?] of them — a [meeting?] the [Surely?] I [considered?] to be [painting?] in [bread?] [sink?] [walking?] a [papering?] — [parts?] of the [carpenter?] [cost?] [inside?] [M's?] [Gull?], I [understand?] [or?] the [Bankers?] [affair?] — They said they [could?] [charge?] the [whole?] & [pay?] it if they [did?] not [authorize?] — I [should?] [keep?] at — I [figured?] & this — 10 is [lander?] — to [find?] [nothing?] [will?] be [done?] but it by their [captain?] (from [Sentence?] to give it an [eagerly?] from [31?]... a [how?] [some?] time) which is not in a [Hype?] [expected?] & the [Nose?], [within?] as a [statement?] on a [subject?] of [Sale?] — It the [Gov't?] [will?] [rate?] it [it?] will [rate?] back in [other?] [times?] — for now it [could?] not [sell?] [rate?] for a 20th [part?] of its [value?] — as this [every?] [camp?] and [be?] — a [guardian?] back — it [it?] would [fall?] after [some?] then [experience?] for [that?] it has [moved?] & since it would have been [called?] [out?] — Also the [Ministries?] have been [however?] [belonging?] & their [Gov't?] — the [Rooms?] are on the [down?] — as [was?] [heard?] — It [writes?] [undecipherable?]
to [some?] [expectation?] to have I [owed?] them in [loftiness?] on a [room?] [mall?] [house?] on a [top?] [part?] of the [Town?], for a [meaning?] I [allow?] — I [need?] think [you?] to speak & the [Secretary?] of [State?], [absolutely?] [most?] — but I give [our?] [own?] [address?] [some?] [any?] [proceeding?] — It is [on?] [think?] to [other?] [that?] [will?] be the [least?] [loneliness?] — [pass?] [into?] [once?] a [Parker?] [those?] — the [Bankers?] from [meeting?] the [shortcut?] already [struck?] [with?] [about?] 100[%?] (they [might?] [suppose?]) — If [nine?] years it will [just?] be [about?] the [only?] by a [regular?] [undecipherable?] — Is all that [was?] [need?] it I [one?] in any [small?] [step?] a [need?] to [undo?] as [comfortable?] [whatever?] — then a [small?] [role?] [furnished?] I know
As a [doctor?] ! ! — any sir — [proceed?] at it [come?] as and [this?] — [our?] as I ought to [try?] you I do with a [January?] [land?] of [some?] [country?] [finding?] to me — it [would?] be [excellent?] the domestic [form?] and — [having?] been already [some?] [solved?] — I am [told?] — & I know [myself?] [has?] been a [prospect?] of [some?] [standing?], with [our?] — I am [only?] [attended?], [another?] — when I [prized?] myself [forward?] for him — I am — [she?] [undecipherable?] could — on I have this [word?] is [enough?] [undecipherable?] on !
As & Then [Commissioners?] — [believe?] on I have been [moved?] [our?] — [grant?] [Texas?]. I [attended?] last the [news?] of the [ranking?] in the [British?] [fleet?] — the [approaching?] of [peace?] [generally?] — the [wresting?] [peace?] — [triumph?] and of [France?] S. The [shape?] on all [coming?] up yet [any?] [other?] [have?] [attracted?] that [mainly?] [ordinary?] that [became?] as [related?] to as a [complain?] in the [importance?] of [of?] all [heard?] the [middle?] [Commissioner?] [man?] about [form?] you — as [form?] the [early?] [Victim?] — I mean here also about the [greatest?] of [affairs?] — the [could?] not have [gone?] [without?] about — the [could?] not have [let?] [making?] a [sacrifice?] of old [for?] he has [said?] a [form?] for
[as?] [years?] — the [duty?] of I have [led?] him to [publicly?] on [Gov't?]. the [could?] have [taken?] that ! the [agree?] — and I see he the [administration?] [took?] all [most?] [taken?] by a [pretty?] [sorry?] — a [putting?] [mind?] — [honestly?] [side?] and by him to be [assassinated?] — by him [could?] [not?] [always?] [enough?] [any?] [way?]
[Now?] [certainly?] I [need?] & I have been [your?] [you?] [come?] and [concern?] as [you?] are not in a [distinct?] [country?] — is [often?] [but?] very [anxious?] about much [most?] of the danger as I see if [Preparation?], [whenever?] is [especially?] a [free?] [appearance?] on [out?] the [results?] by the very day of our [Council?] — [good?] [keep?] — is [direct?] After
To [write?] with [now?] [freedom?] [your?] [need?] [with?] [sign?] [your?] success — and [also?] do not — you can [put?] any [sham?] on the [Inducement?] the I [prove?] a few days after I [spell?] him — [Tell?] he the [happened?] [confidence?] if I [go?] too [main?] — to [Speculation?] a [Science?] in [any?] [alos?] e [Col?] [Pickney?] — my [means?] [get?] an [extremely?] [small?] — all that I can [report?] to [speed?] the [comprehensive?] [character?] of my [Predecessor?] — [he?] is [really?] a very [learned?] and able [man?] of [your?] [accordingly?] [cordial?] in his [communications?] to the — [had?] [our?] [many?] [has?] a [many?] I [don't?] [time?] after any [animal?] — I [get?] [your?] little [just?] from to [the?] him, then [wind?] — bound, at [Media?] a [Hague?] [(a?] [million?] [half?] [has?] him [appointment?] — the [could?] I [come?] and [for?] the [other?] [Sunday?] — and [undecipherable?] [certainly?] [health?] [depend?] [think?] [also?] in I [thought?] by this [them?] [something?]
& this [beautiful?] — I have [my?] [charming?] [child?] [Louis?] [Eliza?] — [following?] [Room?] & [Belgium?] — he [change?] be off — from [Protection?] — a [proof?] — I [need?] to have [me?] with a [cup?] [there?] — I [daily?] [drive?] — the [under?] & know if it be [taking?] a [permanent?] [appointment?] & add him I [said?] not [her?] [not?] ... but it [probably?] was a them [any?] — I am [undecipherable?] — in [not?] that [she?] is — and I have [given?] us — [not?] that there in [confidence?] — [Rome?] B. — [the?] the in [confidence?] — [name?] B. — with the in confidence — [Rome?] B. — are any [clever?] more — the other [highest?] order — and I could you [your?] own — the [aide?] to of [making?] the most [fortunate?] of the [judgment?] [upon?] this [budget?] — a I must [moved?] & [form?] his [undecipherable?]
[Speak?] & [Col?]. [Pickney?] — as the [you?] [done?] & shall [work?] & his [leader?] — they [am?] [some?] able on this letter has [exceeded?] any [designs?] — his [approaching?] by [long?] — but I [see?] not [name?]. [falls?] in a great [which?] [public?] by [you?] — a [To?] or [thing?] — & [never?] to about [what?] [happens?] a [French?] — to — [Sitting?] [available?] — so I [found?] not —
— Mr. [McDonald?] — [memorial?] one not among the [fathers?]. [of?] [you?] [enclosed?] — for a [Chancellor?] 'group' — one [cleverly?] a [success?] — [thing?] — [Col?]. [Pickney?] [completely?] [disconcerted?] the [instruments?] of the [economy?] of [State?] — the [member?] of the [distinguished?] order of [Charles?] the 3d [Chief?] [if?] it is [most?] [found?] with him — [The?] [Lawyer?] is the [thanks?] of his [earnings?]! [And?] [took?] all a [school?] [address?] & [thank?] [throughout?] the U.S. among the most [unusual?] men [undecipherable?] [which?] if it [could?] have been [intended?] in [Jurisdiction?] — [makes?] it [undecipherable?] was [intended?] to their [the?] [supplied?] [satisfaction?] of his [equality?] [pay?] of [source?] than [undecipherable?] was [intended?] to them — the [France?] is in [undecipherable?] — [Claim?] [Claude?] there [one?] about — by the [given?] [undecipherable?] [under?] [undecipherable?] [undecipherable?]
a few days after [I?] [entered?] [yours?] of the [25?] [May?] I [learned?] that in [there?] had been [return?] the [seal?] from [Holland?] [just?] & I [bad?] [was?] & not the [particulars?] for [Gen't?] P. a [mighty?] [over?] [Lost?] — the [days?] after I [got?] a [letter?] from Mr. [Roberts?] [about?] [one?] from [them?] of & I and [responded?] & have been [sent?] — [lack?] of the [others?] I see be a [nothing?] — I [understood?] & [France?] & [paid?] him for [our?] [year?]. It [should?] be a most [pleasant?] [thing?] if you could make him [send?] — [think?] [beyond?] a [strong?] [hope?] in [small?] [bundles?] by their [going?] & any [best?] in [Holland?] —
The [hand?] of [your?] [late?] [extending?] [Gen't?] I [can?] [giving?] [Radcliffe?] [your?] both [Gen't?] I am the [Secretary?] any great [blessing?] — as I think the [liberty?] of [making?] their [past?] & them —
[Present?] a now [affair?] you, [Shall?] have with [pleasure?] the — is not one at the [place?] [but?] as [how?] I could get on — I shall send you [shortly?]'s [dear?] [Pedro?] [del?] [Campo?] with [notes?] by [Recopt?]... a [Callice?] — I see not [few?] of the [other?] [decorated?] at our — I see in that [till?] [45?]
The [surprise?] [monitor?] of this [country?] has [altered?] on a [line?] [but?] [thank?] [God?] I [enjoying?] good health [compared?] to [everything?] I have [based?] [though?] the [year?].
I am with my dear friend with Sincere and affectionate esteem of [Monroe?].
[The?] [enclosed?] [letter?] to the [American?] of [John?] [P?] [or?] is him [giving?] that I — [had?] [just?] [written?] [against?] his [marked?] by — I am at the [grant?] of [God?] that they [side?] [get?] of the [buying?] — you [tell?] them [things?] they [come?] with you — in a [faith?] [told?] you [undecipherable?]
Is [Standing?] this large [exception?] is their [hanker?] [hunted?] on a — a [step?] it may for a [many?] [person?] [again?] — I [thank?] when the [with?] [second?] any [heart?] & [School?] also my [experience?] [more?] [page?] about I have have a [house?] — that if you [find?] the [form?] of the [country?] as a [good?] [district?]. [given?] you the [Committee?] with [meaning?] & [another?] a [certain?] [port?] & a [village?] with the [Directory?] — [after?] [over?] [many?] things [could?] [dispatched?] of [undecipherable?] [Caution?] that the [French?] [might?] [mistake?] for their [opinion?] — [upon?] them [some?] [shouldn't?] [actually?] [raise?] — on [army?] & but the [held?] [down?] for the [large?] [Emigrates?] and for the [troops?] [over?] — [number?] [over?], and [make?] the [arguments?] to [agree?] as [well?] — [explain?] to them any [dear?] [Sir?] as [they?] Shall have [peace?] not — [for?] — If [White?] [question?], I mean [an?] & [preparation?] [against?] [word?] is a [difficulty?] [decided?] a [role?] [Supported?] [purposes?] [Surplus?] — a [manifest?] [undecipherable?] [accompanied?] by a [sincere?] [disposition?] — [Same?] [there?] [undecipherable?] [just?] [actually?] — of [Italy?] [measures?] — [undecipherable?] to [mind?] this [related?] [things?] [expenses?] & [Mill?] ! — It [would?] [bind?] this [relate?] [once?] [expenses?] if you [read?] have been a [Opinion?] [now?] [Gen?] [Thompson?] [about?] [found?] [upon?] that [state?] of [things?] [which?] [kills?] [plans?] after the [peace?] — I [mainly?] [have?] their the [old?] Treaty of 1778 is to be [undecipherable?] — the [American?] ships from [powers?] may be [omitted?] — The [internal?] [view?] of [France?] [her?] — the [One?] [Shift?] from [powers?], are no [action?] [within?] [above?] it [mails?] the [notice?] of — [also?] so they [always?] [will?] as [our?] [action?] in that — [undecipherable?] but that can not have — the great for us — for to many years the [Should?] [equal?] to its [enforcement?]: [hence?] are the [years?]
[to?] [France?] a [down?] — [Sign?] to me — I [grant?] a [loss?] — [up?] [gratify?] [it?] is not [having?] that [he?] [over?] had — it [justly?] to [sell?] it to us [perhaps?] & see if it [can?] so [though?] to let a [company?] be a [long?] time [ready?] — must be [cannot?] be [made?] in any of all [should?] — is [would?] not [placed?] [all?] — The [selected?] [place?]
Russia & G.B. in the month of Feb. made a commercial Treaty — in May it was ratify'd. — upon liberal terms — but nothing new in it—
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Discussion of international affairs and different types of governments. Mentions treaties, sovereignty, indivisibility, etc. Refers to people and locations and various military and political campaigns.
Date
07/14/1797
Author
Recipient
Repository
Collection
Document number
1797071440101
Page start
1
Note
Many pages are illegible.
Notable persons
James McHenry
William Murray
Colonel Pickering
Notable locations
The Hague
Venice
France
Paris
Portugal

