History of the Enclosed
Document 1796Murray discusses the history of his essay written in response to a sketch in the Aurora.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
My dear Sir Cambridge 27. Nov. 95.
Your letter of the 19. I received yesterday and thank you for Tho. — one of which you sent to me before — I shall send both to Andapolis where they may work upon the public mind and do good.
Before you read the inclosed, should you ever read it, delicacy requires of me that you should know its history — after I read the [underline: Sketch] in the Aurora of Adets long list of grievances (wh I wish you could commit to Tracy & me in the committee of claims —) I was so struck with the intended tendencies of the piece that I thought a notice of it might be proper for this part of the country in our little weekly paper — I accordingly scribbled away "a correspondents remarks" — intending to write a number of long [underline: paragraphs] — on the several heads — & send them to Cowen — When I had embarked in the subject in the 2d page of the 2d sheet — a thought struck me that a proper respect for our cabinet precluded any remarks in the news papers till the Tone had been given by them —
and you will perceive the breaking forth of this thought when I refer to Bysker [undecipherable] — for then I thought I would continue scribbling on as a letter to you — just in the confidential, friendly way in which we have been accustomed to debate our public grievances — and so I continued all this day scribbling, as you may judge from the [underline: size] of the [underline: letter] — but I do not enjoin you to read it.
The notes from Valin's Commentary are in my common place a Do. I send them — I took them from Mr King's — probably Smith has them. I never saw Valin — & have no rated him — or I would have been your extractor —
I would most certainly go up before the Session — but Shippen has been with me a few days here — thrown me back in my progress of some hook & — as I pitched on a new frame I must attend to it. I shall go to Monroe work my complimts to Mrs Wolcott if you see them soon. yr [undecipherable] & affectionately Wol[undecipherable]
Type
Autograph Letter Signed
Description
Murray discusses the history of his essay written in response to a sketch in the Aurora.
Date
11/27/1796
Author
Recipient
Repository
Collection
Document number
1796112740101
Page start
1
Note
Difficult handwriting.
Notable persons
James McHenry
William Vans Murray
Tracy
Cowan
Mr. King
Smith
Dr. Shippers
Notable locations
Annapolis
Cambridge
Notable items
sketch in the Aurora
long list of grievances
committee
little weekly paper
long paragraphs
respect for our cabinet
newspapers
grievances
scribbling
commentary
session

