Observations regarding the Saint Croix River boundary dispute
Document 1796Memo regarding the St. Croix dispute between the British and United States over the northeastern boundary line, said by the Jay Treaty to be resolved through arbitration. McHenry urges that the third commissioner be "disinterested" and uncorrupted, therefore excluding inhabitants from Massachusetts and New Brunswick who may favor certain boundaries.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
24 July 1796
Observations on papers transmitted from the Secy of State respecting settling the Nova S. Croix desputes.
[Observation on —]
[1 Question by Mr H[ouse].]
If the third commissioner is to be filled up by Col. as an answer [undecipherable] [Bales?], the astronomer [undecipherable] be ought to go with Mr House & Whitelaw to Nova Scotia, [lot?] [undecipherable] to [undecipherable] business immediately after his accession to the commission. Being of opinion that the two commissioners will not come to a [undecipherable], and that the feelings [undecipherable] of the commission [undecipherable] be by Col. I would [undecipherable] therefore a little [undecipherable] ordinary expense to facilitate the early commencement of the business rather than save a little money by leaving them behind till the result of the conference at Nova Scotia could be known.
[strikethrough: [undecipherable] by [undecipherable] from [undecipherable]]
[2 Question by Mr House.]
Mr House [and?] doubt ought to endeavour to obtain a disinterested person for third commissioner, by [undecipherable] with Col. [Barkley?] and [undecipherable] ought to [undecipherable] a disqualification [undecipherable] from [undecipherable] by [undecipherable] why Col. But he ought not to refuse to draw lots should he see no probability of [obtaining another commissioner?] by negotiation.
[3 Ques[tion] by Mr House.]
A Person claiming land [and/where?] title [undecipherable] of [undecipherable] day may be [undecipherable] by the [office?] of the dispute [undecipherable] objectionable as a commissioner in the first degree. A citizen of the State or Province [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] will be [undecipherable] objectionable in the next degree. So far as an inhabitant of Massachusetts, New Brunswick or Nova Scotia falls and in either distinction [they?] cannot be considered as equally objectionable.
[Conclusion.]
On the whole [undecipherable] in [undecipherable] that one commissioner is a citizen of the [undecipherable] and another a subject of Nova Scotia. Consider [undecipherable] in the first place, that [undecipherable] is more chance of [undecipherable] agreeing upon a third commissioner, and in the second [undecipherable] that the dispute will be decided by the [party?] who is so qualified to obtain his man by [lot?], of course that it sooner [undecipherable] knows the better, after allowing the two former [undecipherable] a reasonable time for the display of their respective abilities [undecipherable] those die immediately for the cause in question [undecipherable] the better.
MH. 24th July 1796
Type
Autograph Draft Document
Description
Memo regarding the St. Croix dispute between the British and United States over the northeastern boundary line, said by the Jay Treaty to be resolved through arbitration. McHenry urges that the third commissioner be "disinterested" and uncorrupted, therefore excluding inhabitants from Massachusetts and New Brunswick who may favor certain boundaries.
Date
07/24/1796
Author
Repository
Collection
Document number
1796072400101
Page start
1
Notable persons
James McHenry
Sullivan
Howel
Secretary of State
astronomer
surveyor
Howell
commissioner
British
Notable locations
Massachusetts
New Brunswick
Nova Scotia
St. Croix River
Canada
Britain
Maine
Notable items
Commission
expense
land

