Trade, Frontier, and Relations with Spain
Document 1796Discussed trade of skins and furs with Indians, noted Spain as principal rival of U.S.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Sr] [Heads?] of War Feb 29th 179[3?]
Sir
Agreeble to my intention I had the [undecipherable] of [addressing?] a [few?] [undecipherable] correspondence [ago?] as I have been able to [collect?] [respecting?] the [trade?] with the [Southern?] Indians I [undecipherable] every [effort?] [undecipherable] find by the intelligence I have collected that it has been [customary?] to [supply?] the whole [bands?] on credit in the [undecipherable] [depositary?] of [some?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] the Indians by [filling?] them not with [undecipherable] [necessary?] for their [wants?] by that means [giving?] their [nation?] of [those?] [undecipherable] this [seems?] to have been the custom with the [leaders?] of the U[nited] S[tates] & then [rendering?] in the [Spanish?] & [therefore?] the principal rival to this Country [addresses?] in an [undecipherable] [on?] [house?] of Pensacola and the [firm?] of Panton [Leslie?] &c. then [profitably?] [engaged?] by long [stands?] [among?] [a?] part of the [land?] of the Creeks & [Cherokees?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] they have an extensive credit from the [gov?] of Spain & have established houses in various parts of the Country but they have had the misfortune of one of their principal [shops?] [undecipherable] I carried out. [Charleston?] [furnished?] [a?] new [one?] able to [furnished?] [undecipherable] of [assortment?] of goods which has been on [account?] of a number of [traders?] coming to this [post?] full of [grapefulness?] of getting [a?] credit [supply?] how [far?] it will be practicable to establish a trade with the Indians independent of these whole [leaders?] I without credit I [cannot?] [undertake?] to determine but I conceive it will be attended [undecipherable] much difficulties the Indians have long been [tolerated?] [undecipherable] their [supplies?] [through?] these people I now [appears?] to overcome long [standing?] habits
you must [deadly?] concern me, nor do I [undecipherable] [deemed?] it [public?] to attempt [such?] it altogether at this [time?] that [they?] must be [accountable?] risk in giving them a [undecipherable] from [credit?] appears to me very certain they are [undecipherable] [made?] [to?] [undecipherable] people they can easily [remove?] themselves [undecipherable] [only?] [enough?] [placing?] so as to be out. The [result?] of this government & their [transaction?] [as?] not more than an Indian [woman?] I [some?] [miserable?] [Indian?] [dealing?] with [they?] & [for?] the latter they may [supply?] & [have?] is a [ready?] [get?] & [destroy?] [the?] Indian Country as a [hand?] to [feed?] [those?] children they [die?] me [are?] not all under the [command?] of the [father?], but [mind?] [naturally?] of the [land?] of [lands?] of the [same?] [back?] in [family?] [many?] of them are [dispersed?] [built?] [camps?]. [Cherokees?] [shine?] [undecipherable] [Indian?] [trade?] to [depend?] on as [foresaid?] I [acknowledge?] [perhaps?] the [aspect?] of the United States by having on this [place?] to [take?] away their [leaders?] & [connect?] them for the [towns?] they sit down in has a [considerable?] [influence?] & those with caution [every?] to be the [young?] of [his?] [deputies?], [have?] [such?] [connection?] with the Indians [action?] of peace to [undecipherable] on their [public?] [cattle?] very [delay?] on [appearance?] of [attempts?] a [diversion?] of peace or [doubt?], but is the [subjects?] is [only?] [provided?] [his?] [prevention?] among the Indians & [that?] is very [founded?] [principally?] among them [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] them [only?] [judged?] by the [people?] of [filling?] their they can easily [calculated?] by filling on our side [some?] of [a?] [mean?] they always [have?] in company as [purposes?] [undecipherable] these goods the [claim?] most of the [foresaid?] [were?] from this [place?] I [foresee?] [undecipherable] they [pay?] a Common [hand?] or to [poor?] not [perhaps?] [water?] [born?] to come to a a [discovery?] like [born?] the [only?] of the [journey?] would be very [undecipherable]
[slaughter?] [from?] would cut up his whole pack & I am [told?] they are too [prosperous?] of each other to [bear?] I [remain?] that [undecipherable] their [undecipherable] to be [from?] [they?] [trouble?] to the [second?] [pleasure?] of our own country from the [subjects?]. [then?] [must?] be [leaders?] [done?] is not [subjects?] [for?] every [Independent?] to [go?] [to?] [those?] [only?] [for?] [who?] [letter?] keeping his [wants?] & I have no doubt [fifty?] [talent?] would make Indians as [liable?] to [select?] as White traders. If I [were?] to [hazard?] my opinion (the my ideas must be crude [as?] [yet?] [undecipherable]) [should?] I would recommend [giving?] a [firm?] [important?] conduct [with?] [respect?] to the [mode?] of [supplying?] & [as?] [far?] as [bounty?] as [possible?] they [will?] regulate one another [with?] [which?] the [prices?] to the Indians [more?] to [consecrate?] [the?] giving of only one [trader?] to [advance?] to be [altogether?] [probable?] it gives [from?] an opportunity to [select?] I believe much Caution is necessary on [Confiding?] traders [for?] [ought?] it to be [confirmed?] to those of the best known [reputation?] [making?] a [schedule?] [too?] on price [between?] prompt payment & credit [should?] be [common?] of [buying?] them into the habits of [hand?] traffic [firm?] than [allow?] how certainly [make?] [to?] much difficulty at present or [implicitly?] [adopt?] the [mode?] [directed?] on [undecipherable] [considerations?] [the?] [action?] [from?] it [gives?] [undecipherable] [form?] of [fermentation?] for the [recent?] [figures?] by [a?] [accomplishment?] mode of conduct. It may [perhaps?] be [brought?] about, on [time?] I cannot [indulge?] to my [spare?] [form?] of [affairs?] my caution to [attend?] the
[Missing Page/s — Some or all of the pages of this file are wholly or in part missing, and we have not been able to locate a more complete copy of the document.]
Type
Document
Description
Discussed trade of skins and furs with Indians, noted Spain as principal rival of U.S.
Date
02/24/1796
Author
Recipient
Document number
1796022440201
Page start
1
Notable persons
James McHenry
Edward Price
Notable locations
frontier
trading post

