Colonel Rochfontaine
31st January
1797
Recd 7th Feby
Samuel Hodgdon Esquire
Superintendent of Military Stores
Philadelphia
Westpoint Jany 31st 1797
Sir,
I send you the two enclosed Letters to prove to you that there are due to the compy. of Kalteiren at Charlestown South Carolina, the following articles upon the due bill granted to that detachment when ready to depart for New York. vix.
- Sergt. Coat,
1 - [Sergt.] vest,
4 - [Sergt.] woolen overalls - or Linnen overalls if more Suitable to the climat.
4 - [Sergt.] Shirts.
The above articles will be charged to Capt. Frye in whose hands they remained after the departure of Leiutt Robinson’s detachment.
thirty pairs of Woolen Socks are also due to that company, besides what will be applied for directly by the Captain for the remainder of his company, to which was to be incorporated the detachment under Lieut. Robeson.
Respectfully I am, Sir,
Your obedt Servt
Step. Rochefontaine Lt. Col. Commdr of ye corps of Arty & Engrs
Sam: Hodgdon - Esquire
Fort Johnston So Carolina
Jany 4th 1796
I arrived heare with the Detachment for this place on [the] 28th December, after a very disagreeable passage of 29 Days - my Due bill for one Sergts. Coat, one do Vest, four do. woolen overalls & four do Shirts I did not get at Governors Island as Capt Fry had none of those articles - their is a mistake in the socks The return to the Quartr Master specifies 39 pair & on my due bill their is only nine pr.
I am Sir with Respect your Obdt Servt
Jona Robeson Lieut. in in the Corps of Arty & Engineers
Lieut Colo Stephen Rochefontaine
Commdr of the Corps of Arty & Engineers
West Point Jany 30th 1797
Sir,
Having compared the Return of Captain McKee for the Clothing due the detachment of Capt. Kalteiren with the Duplicate of the Due Bill given for the balance of the said Clothing, I find the return was for <thirty nine pair of Socks, & that this Due Bill owing to the pairs being written in two lines, was by mistake for nine pairs only, as stated by Lieut Robeson in his letter of the 4th Inst. - I have reason also to believe that the Sergeants Clothing intended for that detachment & forwarded to Capt. Frye did not arrive in time to be delivered
[Administrative notation, written diagonally]: [undecipherable] Hochfontaine
19 January 1797
[Received from State Dep't. Nov. 24. 1894. R.P.O.401810.]
15
Samuel Hodgdon
Super Intendant of Military [Stores?]
Philadelphia
West point January 19th 1797.
Sir,
[Received from State Dep't. Nov. 24.1894. R.P.O.401310.]
I received yesterday your Letter of the 13th Inst. [strikethrough: explaining] importing your views respecting the Publick Stores to be delivered to the Several Detachments of the Corps of Art. & Eng.rs of which you will send here monthly a Statement; I think it will have the desired effect of Checking the improper application, you might even prevent them, if you would require of the Commanding officers of Detachments an Estimate of the Clothing necessary for Six months to come, by ex: in the month of [undecipherable], application might be made to you for all the Clothing & other Stores for the Ensuing Summer. — in June to July, another application might be forwarded for the Winter Supplies — as there would be time Enough before it would be actually wanted; the Estimate might be first here for Examination & Comparison with the actual Situation of the Detachments
which are regularly Sent here of the Detachments. but from the immediate application to the Sec. of war for all Supplies, the officers are all persuaded that from the moment they are at the head of a Command, their Corps form a Corps by itself. Subject to no Controul but that of the Sec. of war — under whose authority they are provided with whatever they are in want of, the accounts of Deliveries falling into an improper Channel are lost, and after a while it is impossible to trace where the Stores have been furnished, and how they have been apply'd. I have long been of opinion with you, that the Quarter Masters Office is the proper place where ought to be Collected the returns of Supplies furnished to the Several Detachments, and where the accounts of Deliveries ought to be transmitted, for they may be at all times Checked by the returns and Situation of the Detachments; then the Quarter
[missing pages]
[Administrative notation]: Colonel Rochfontaine / 31st January / 1797 / Recd [undecipherable]
7
Samuel Hodgdon — Esquire
Superintendant of Military Stores
Philadelphia
West point Jany 31st 1797
Sr,
I Send you the two enclosed Letters to prove to you there are due to the comp.y of Kaltisen at Charleston South Carolina, the following articles upon the Due Bill granted to detachment when ready to Depart for New York: — viz:
1. Ser.t Coat,
1 ditto Vest,
4 ditto Woolen overalls, or Linnen overalls [undecipherable] Climate.
4 Ditto Shirts.
the above articles will be Charge'd to [undecipherable] hands they remain'd after the Departure of [undecipherable] Johnson —
thirty pairs of Woolen Socks are also due to that Comp.y, besides what will be applied for directly by the Captain for remainder of his Company, & which was to be incorporated with
Der Lieut Robeson.
Respectfully I am,
Sir,
Your Obed.t Serv.t
Sep. Rochefontaine
lt Col. Com.dt of [the Corps]
of Art.l [Eng.rs]
Mr. Hodgdon — Esquire.
Sir Fort Johnston S. Carolina
Jany 4th 1796
I arrived here with the Detachment for this Place on ye 28th December. after a very disagreeable passage of 29 Days —
my Due bill for one Ser.t Coat one d.o Vest four d.o Woolen overalls & four d.o Shirts I did not get at Governors Island as Capt Fry had none of those articles — their is a mistake on the dockets the Return to the Qu.r Master Specifies 39 men. & on my due bill their is only nine ——
I am Sir With Respect your
Obedt Serv.d
Jon: Robeson Lieu.t in
the Corps of Art.l Engineers
Lieut Col. Stephen Rochesfontaine
Commd of the Corps of Art.l Engineers
West Point Jany 30th 1797
Sir,
Having Compared the Return of Captain McRea for the Clothing due the detachment of Capt Kaltisen, with the Duplicate of the Due Bill given for the balance of the said Clothing, I find the return was for thirty nine pairs of Socks, & that the Due Bill owing to the Same being written in two lines, was by mistake for nine persons only, as stated by Lieut Robeson in his letter of the 4th [undecipherable] — I have reason also to believe that the Serjeants Clothing intended for that detachment & forwarded to Capt Frye did not arrive in time to be delivered