No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Page 1]
[?] up trust for the [undecipherable], as it is given the British, a pretext or colour for [?] them — [?] into the Americans refused to allow on at their [posts?] any [Frenchmen?] on the British side of that line — only [when?] the [Americans?] should allow them to [?], immediately after they the Americans were [defensible?] in force in the thing — and it was upon the British to [guarantee?] the [decision?] that [needed?] to [be?] made, was to make a [General?] [attack?] upon the [promised?] the same time —
But the British [wanted?] to prepare to [attack?] the Americans —
[undecipherable] in very [Great?] [?] to [come?] [the?] [Chiefs?] to keep [their?] [from?] being [along?], for [there?] [?] [others?] [who?] take them to [keep?] [?] [force?] [?], his [strong?], for [?] [others?] returns them to the [?] [with?] [his?] [countenance?], [are?] [too?] many [again?] to [?] of [going?] [through?] the [great?] [Army?] [as?] is [?] [which?] [comes?] before [?] of [that?] [which?] continues to [be?] [?] [that?] [?] [can?] [be?] [?] [?] [of?] [their?] — [and?] [?] [he?] [always?] [has?] [employed?] [their?] — [and?] it [would?] [seem?] [as?] [though?] the [British?] [on?] [this?] [hand?] [by?] [it?] [were?] [?] [?] [?] [attacking?] —
[undecipherable] their [attachment?] to [Britain?] [is?] [not?] [only?] [?] [well?] [just?] [placed?] [upon?] [them?] [after?] [having?] upon [?] [their?] [allegiance?] [?] — [undecipherable] — to [?] [them?] [in?] [their?] [power?] [?] [Britain?] — [undecipherable] — [or?] [then?] [there?] [were?] [?] [many?] [there?] [and?] [?] [on?] [the?] [side?] [of?] [?] —
[undecipherable paragraph]
[undecipherable] [the?] British [would?] [keep?] [present?] to [force?] them with [their?] [Merchants?] [and?] [Proprietors?] of [those?] [?] [Manufactures?] [instructing?] the [Army?] of [Nations?] — [undecipherable] — [and?] [once?] [their?] [power?] [is?] [from?] [those?] — [that?] [?] [about?] [the?] [order?] of [these?] [great?] — [undecipherable] — [that?] [Britain?] has [?] [after?] [these?] [themselves?] [is?] [to?] [?] [any?] [?] [something?] [and?] [they?] [have?] [?] a [majority?] to [?] [for?] [coming?] [sure?] [that?] [the?] [Nations?] [?] [they?] do [not?] [?] —
[undecipherable paragraphs]
[?] [undecipherable] that [the?] Chiefs and Nations are [most?] [?] — one [from?] for [one?] [for?] [him?] — the [Regiment?] of [Sandusky?] is [for?] [?] [years?] — [and?] [his?] [agreement?] upon the [British?] for [provisions?] — The [Government?] [?] is for [their?] — the [Potawatomi?] [?] [?] — [are?] [well?] [some?] [?] [years?] [from?] that [side?] [?] — that [which?] of the [Chiefs?] [?] of [?] [Warriors?] are [inclined?] to [peace?] [and?] [there?] [is?] [not?] [a?] [General?] [?] [present?] [to?] [?] [about?] [keeping?] short [of?] [justice?] [?] the [?] [same?] [purpose?] as they [wish?] to [?] them [down?] [under?] the [Americans?] — [and?] [such?] [?] [British?] [chiefs?] [tell?] [them?] [?] [?] [?] —
[undecipherable] [?] [?] — [that?] the [Indians?] is [?] [this?] [great?] [concerns?] — what a [?] [?] [opportunity?] [that?] the [Indians?] [of?] [?] [are?] [now?] [friendly?] [?] those [who?] [?] the [?] [?] [American?] [?] — [undecipherable] — [that?] [?] [?] [there?] [?] [?] [the?] [American?] [?] [?] — perhaps they [?] from the [problem?] of the [Americans?] — [?] a [part?] with the [last?] [?] — [undecipherable] — they [can?] obtain a [majority?] for [peace?] among the [Nations?] [unless?] they do not [?] —
---
[Page 2]
[Nova Diaries?]
Greenville, 4 January 1796
Sir,
I have to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 18th of November 17[95?] [William?] with the enclosed which fully [communicates?] your further [earnestness?] to promote peace between the United States of America and the hostile tribes of Indians — It [will?] [next?] appear to [have?] [fortunately?] [been?] [effectually?] delayed some progress to [their?] [firm?] [sad?] result in [Order?] to be to the Chief of the [few?] stations mentioned or implied at the [?] but [apprehension?] that the present fall of [snow?] happened that they [are?] from arriving at this place for some days yet.
I must request you to explain my [?] [fully?] to all the [Ottawa?] Chiefs and Warriors of Sandusky, and to [their?] Delawares also [at?] in the [?] of [Order?], that they [briefly?] [see?] the Chiefs of the [Regiment?] of [Bellefont?] River, the [?] [Managers?] of [Business?] [urgently?] referred to are very [amiably?] with the present [Speech?], and [long?] [determination?] after they are in [payment?] of [costs?] are [also?] [falls?] for them to [mention?] with the United States any longer — for as [recent?] as [their?] at a great [trial?] after — they [seek?] to [firmly?] [address?] on the [accounts?] of the amazing [strong?] and [numerous?] if they do not embrace the peace now [of/in?] [form?].
Upon [Brother?] Abraham [has?] [given?] [provision?] [place?] of my [friendship?], and [agrees?] for [you?] with [provision?] of other [our?] [further?] [needs?] of [Indian?] [establishing?] a [permanent?] peace between the United States and the [Indian tribes?] [Northwest?] of the [Ohio?] — [perhaps?] you may [find?] the [expediency?] [concerned?] him [prior?] to come forward immediately with the other Chiefs to [Greenville?] —
Wishing you a [spring?] [termination?] of our great [terms?] in [form?]
[signed]
Anthony Wayne
[No person or [?] can come to [Greenville?] from Philadelphia that which you have been able to explain with [Indians?]]
[Mr Isaac Williams Agent
to the Indians of Sandusky]