Collision of State and Federal Jurisdictions
Document 1794In response to President Washington's suspension thereof, Governor Mifflin makes his case for the establishment of a town at Presque Isle as necessary for the defense of the western frontier of Pennsylvania. Though he will comply with Washington's directive, he implies that the suspension was an abuse of executive authority.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Copy. June 11th 1794
The Governor's explanatory
The President of the laws which
the U. States regulated his
conduct in executing the Law
for laying out a Town at
Presque Isle —
Examined
James Tremble
Deputy Secy]
Sir
I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your answer (communicated in a letter from the Secretary of War dated this day) to my letter of the 13th instant, stating that the reasons which induced your opinion relatively to the suspension of the Presque isle establishment, continue to operate; and have not been weakened by any information since received.
The nature of the trust reposed in me by the Act of the General Assembly, the dissatisfaction which a suspension of the proceedings of the Commissioners has excited, and the ambiguity of some of the expressions contained in the Secretary's letter, seem to demand an early explanation of the principles that have regulated my conduct upon this occasion.
As it is the peculiar province of the Legislature to judge of the policy of the laws, it would be thought, perhaps, an act of supererogation on my part, were I to attempt to enumerate the various motives, which suggested and justify the Act for laying out a Town at Presque Isle: but I may be indulged in observing, generally, that the maintenance of a system for the sale and settlement of the public lands (by which a sufficient revenue had been produced to exonerate the State from the pressure of her debts) and the obligation of the General Assembly to strengthen the means of protecting our distant [undecipherable]
might fairly be considered by the Representatives of Pennsylvania as very cogent inducements to the measure, which they contemplated. With a right, acquired by honest purchase; either to advance, or to decline, the establishment of a Town at (Presque isle); the expediency of exercising that right, must have formed the principal subject of consideration; and when we reflect, that the consequences of a rupture with the Six Nations, would in a peculiar manner be injurious to the citizens of this State; we must presume that the Legislature either thought that the improvement of our territory in that quarter could not be obnoxious to the Indians, or that the projected establishment would afford the most effectual defence against that hostile disposition, which even the Southern Tribes had previously manifested, for reasons certainly unconnected with our plans of settlement. Nor could a collision of the State and Federal jurisdictions have been anticipated, as naturally flowing from the measure; since it was rather to be expected by the Legislature; that, independently of the Constitutional obligation of the Union to protect all its members, in the enjoyment of their respective territorial rights, the Federal Government was, in this instance, peculiarly bound to maintain the title and occupancy of the State; as a tender for a valuable consideration, of the property in question.
But what ever may be the policy of the Legislature, there are maxims common to all principles, a [undecipherable]
consequences; the province of an Executive Magistrate is certainly circumscribed to enquire what the law is, not what it ought to be; to perform the task prescribed, not to arraign the wisdom that prescribed it. Hence, Sir, you will perceive from the documents (which have been regularly communicated to you) that the prosecution of the preparatory steps for forming a settlement at Presque isle was imposed upon me as a duty, and consequently that the most cogent reasons will be necessary, on my part, to justify a neglect or suspension of the work. By the Act of the 8th of April 1793, it is declared, in mandatory terms, that in the most eligible spot within the reserved tract in lake Erie, the Governor shall cause to be laid out and surveyed 1600 Acres of Land, in town lots not more than ⅕ of an acre each; and also 2400 Acres adjoining the same, in out lots, not less than 5 acres nor more than 10 acres each; and, that every obstacle arising from an apprehension of hostile opposition might be removed, an Act of the 28th of February 1794, after providing for the security of the Port of Philadelphia and the defence of our Western Frontier, authorises "the Governor to detach from the several companies of Artillery and Infantry, raised by the State; as many men as can be conveniently spared from the specific objects of protection and defence; [undecipherable] detachments [undecipherable] were particularly selected; and by relation the detachment was to make at such place or places, after assembling, as on Lake Erie, as [undecipherable] had previously [undecipherable] to carry into effect the establishment [undecipherable]
Town at Presque Isle; to protect the infant settlements beyond the River Alleghany, and to promote the general defence of the Frontier." (By the language of those Acts it is obvious (as I have remarked on a former occasion) that nothing was expressly left to my discretion but the mode of carrying them into effect: and, conclusively, to demonstrate the Legislative expectation of a speedy execution of that trust, it can only be necessary to consider, that by the first regulation, the time for allowing a bounty to persons who "shall actually inhabit and reside within the town", was limited to the 1st of January 1794; that, by the second regulation, it is only protracted to the first day of May 1795; and that, by the third regulation, the very existence of the Companies, from which the detachment is formed to carry into effect the Act for laying out the Town, is limited (in its utmost extent) to the meeting of the General Assembly on the ensuing month of December.
Acting under the peremptory injunction to perform a specific duty, I have not, Sir, been regardless, either of the respect that is due to the General Government, or of the precautions which a movement of so delicate a nature required. The laws, and my instructions founded on those laws, for forming the detachment and laying out the Town, were communicated to you during the Session of Assembly; and, although any attempt to intercept the proceedings of the Commissioners, must have been accompanied with [undecipherable]
a deliberate and hostile invasion of the State of Pennsylvania (for, it has never been intimated that the station at Presque isle is actually pre-occupied by any other power, whether British or Indian) I admonished the Officers and Commissioners to observe a friendly and conciliatory conduct towards every description of Persons whom they should meet; and even in the event of an attack, or menace from any quarter, to confine their resistance strictly to defensive operations, within the acknowledged boundaries of the State.
The machinating efforts of the agents of a Foreign nation, in the neighbourhood of the United States, and [not] the inimical disposition of the Indians, produced in my mind the apprehension of a design to oppose the settlement at Presque isle; soon after the detachment, for effecting that object, was formed at Pittsburgh; and the intelligence which was brought by successive posts, and punctually communicated to you, Sir, rendered it, at last, expedient in my judgment, to resort to the general authority of the Militia law, for calling into actual service a competent force to repel the threatened invasion; to support the party destined for Presque isle; and generally to prevent a failure of the measures which the Legislature had directed to be pursued; and which, without further authority, I did not conceive it would be warrantable to abandon. On your receipt of a Copy of my order for making this draft, it was, for the first time, directly stated to me, that [undecipherable]
deemed it adviseable to suspend, for the present, the establishment at Presque isle; and "if it will, indeed, be happy, that the circumstances which have already occurred, should not be found to have matured the evil beyond the possibility of a remedy." I derive some consolation in recollecting, that you were possessed of the law, while the Legislature (whose power was alone competent to repeal it) was in Session; that you were seasonably apprised of every step that was taken to carry it into effect; and that if, from information unknown to me, an earlier discontinuance of the Executive proceedings was deemed salutary, my conduct will evince the readiness, with which I should have acquiesced in an earlier declaration of that opinion.
But I confess, Sir, that, on this ground, I perceive very little cause for disquietude or reproach. If the Legislature has prescribed a task to the Executive Magistrate; which cannot be performed without endangering the public tranquility, the Legislature, and not the Executive Magistrate, must be responsible for the consequences. But there is, indeed, another reflection which weighs heavily on my mind at the present moment; and which claims, perhaps an interest in your consideration of the subject: Can the requisition or advice of the Executive authority of the United States, justify the Act which suspends the operation of a positive law of [undecipherable]
Pennsylvania? The Constitutional supremacy of the laws of the Union will not be disputed: but may it not be asked, what law of the Union does, nay what power there is to pass a law which could control the Commonwealth, in the legitimate exercise of her territorial jurisdiction? Where there is no law, there can be no obligation; nor, consistently with the principles of a Republican Government, can reasons of State; or the admonition of circumstances (upon which the Secretary at War relies) furnish an Executive magistrate with an authority to substitute his opinions for Legislative institutions. While, then, I was impressed with these sentiments, the prompt compliance which followed the communication of your wishes for the suspension of the Presque isle establishment, must, at least, be regarded as an incontrovertible evidence of an official disposition to promote the views of the General Government; of an earnest desire to cultivate every possible means of peace; and of a personal confidence in your judgment and patriotism: but, however consolatory such considerations may be to my private feelings, as my public trust may require other instruments of vindication; I receive, with peculiar satisfaction, "an assurance that nothing will be omitted to obviate the temporary obstacles which exist." The bare suspension of our measures will, probably indeed, prove [undecipherable]
the difficulty of accomplishing them; and any great delay might eventually introduce a controversy upon the right of doing so. The evil would become irremediable by any peaceable process, if, taking advantage of the circumstances which have already occurred, either the Six Nations, or any other ill-disposed neighbours should seize on the station, which has been designated for our establishment.
For these contingencies, however, and for the expence which the State has already incurred, I have no doubt, the justice of the General Government will satisfactorily provide. It only remains, therefore, Sir, to repeat, that (notwithstanding the remark made by the Secretary at War) in his letter of the 24th ulto.) I am not sensible of having failed in duty, appreciating every consideration of delicacy and moment, connected with the subject: and that, whatever may be the result, the establishment at Presque isle will be suspended, until you shall vary the opinion which you have delivered.
I am, with perfect respect
Philadelphia, Sir,
June 11th 1794. Your Excellency's
To Most obedient
The President
of the United States (signed) Tho. Mifflin
Type
Letter Signed
Description
In response to President Washington's suspension thereof, Governor Mifflin makes his case for the establishment of a town at Presque Isle as necessary for the defense of the western frontier of Pennsylvania. Though he will comply with Washington's directive, he implies that the suspension was an abuse of executive authority.
Date
06/14/1794
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Philadelphia
Collection
Document number
1794061400101
Page start
1
Notable persons
George Washington
Thomas Mifflin, Governor of Pennsylvania
Commissioners
representatives of Pennsylvania
the Legislature
companies of Artillery and Infantry
British
Six Nations of Indians
Notable locations
Port of Philadelphia
River Allegheny
Pittsburgh
Notable items
suspension of the Presque Isle establishment
Acts of the General Assembly
policy of the laws
act of supererrogation
Act for laying out a town at Presque Isle
sale and settlement of public lands
pressure of debts
protecting our distant frontiers
purchase
rupture with the Six Nations
improvement of our territory
hostile disposition
collision of the State and Federal jurisdictions
Constitutional obligations of the Union
territorial rights
province of an Executive Magistrate
infant settlements
Act for laying out the town
deliberate and hostile invasion
acknowledged boundaries
machinating efforts of the Agents of a Foreign nation
genral authority of the Militia-law
threatened invasion
executive authority
public tranquility
Constitutional supremacy of the laws of the Union
legitimate exercise of her territorial jurisdiction
principles of a Republican government
every possible means of peace
evil

