[archival notation at top right, partially legible] 6. Sep. 1792 Minutes of a conversation which passed between the [Sec-] retary of State, with Don Joseph Viar, and Don Joseph [Jaudenes] commissioners his Catholic Majesty; this 6^th day of Sepr. 1792. The [Sec]retary having made to the [said] Commissioners [at a] family dinner. the conversation were naturally introduced by themselves about Panton. [also] they said & [undecipherable] to be [shewed] he was required at [undecipherable] if required to [whether] they would furnish [a list?] of finding them [on another] — they said they did not know that they [undecipherable] to him — I mentioned [that] Hammond having [represented?] [the?] able [undecipherable] on [the behalf?] of [the?] [United?] army [pursued?] an authority to [find?] [Panton] — They said they had [to monopoly?] [undecipherable] and there [those?] for [undecipherable] the idea of [perhaps?] here [undecipherable] understanding at the [beginning?] [undecipherable] by the [Governor?]