6. Sep 1792 [undecipherable] [undecipherable struck-through line] Minutes of a conversation, which passed between the Secretary of State and Don Joseph Yza[undecipherable], and Dr. Joseph Jum[undecipherable], commissionary of his Catholic Majesty, this 6^th day of Sept. 1792. The Secretary having made the said Commissary to a family dinner, the conversation was naturally introduced by themselves about Bowles. They had [↑and↑] they had [undecipherable] it [undecipherable] to be alleged he was [undecipherable] at last; I enquired whether they would [undecipherable] of sending them to the [nation?] — They said they did not know how they intended to — I mentioned M^r Hammond having declared [the?] [undecipherable] on the behalf of [his?] [undecipherable] army, [undecipherable] on authority to[ward] Bowles — They said they had [undecipherable], [undecipherable] but there [those?] those who did not [undecipherable] the idea of his [undecipherable] being given him [undecipherable], his own [undecipherable] at the [undecipherable] by the [undecipherable]. [I?] mentioned to them, that there [was?] one [undecipherable] [undecipherable] the other point [of?] [undecipherable] [to?] the [undecipherable]. The [undecipherable] they had [undecipherable] — cannot understood [on?] — [undecipherable] man on [for?] [a?] [undecipherable] to [Bowles?] but Knew nothing about [Mellbury?/Wellbury?] I mentioned to them that a [near?] [undecipherable] had [sprung?] up among [the?] [Creek?] [undecipherable] the [undecipherable] [Simms?] [Appomazpe?] [agent?], and a [Copy?] of the [legend?] of their [undecipherable], and that he nine [undecipherable] [including?] that [undecipherable] — but however he [undecipherable] is on going [uniform?] — but however [undecipherable] — [undecipherable] [undecipherable] as [be?] [undecipherable] on [undecipherable] any [authority?] [to?] [undecipherable] for he [to?] [exhaust?] the other [undecipherable] knowing not [undecipherable] him [the?] [undecipherable] [actually?] [take?] — [treaty?] made with the Creeks at New York [having?] [taken?] [that?] [undecipherable] the [undecipherable] M^r Hammond and [that?] [undecipherable] for he [had?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] the [matter?] to New York — [to?] [undecipherable] him — [and?] [after?] the [late?] [undecipherable] [undecipherable] generally [undecipherable] him [whether?] [any?] the [undecipherable] [something] [K]new of [our?] [undecipherable] — They [replied?] they [a]dopted, [undecipherable] M^r [Jefferson?] [now?] and [here?] [b]eing of [him?] [that?] M^r Jefferson had [would?] [go?] to [them?] [undecipherable] [said?] [when?] [with?] [them?] [undecipherable] there they [Meant?] [undecipherable] [to?] have — but they did not concur the [fund?] [from?] [the?] [undecipherable] going — [and?] [there?] [undecipherable] [B]eing [there?] [have?] any more but there [undecipherable] The [undecipherable] [then?] [undecipherable] [agreements?] as [when?] for [of?] them [some?] [must?] any [undecipherable] [In?] the ter[ritory?] of New York they [concerned?] [with?] [the?] [decreed?] he [would?] be Known in the ordinary channels of the [C]ommunication That the [M]orning [government?] have [from?] [some?] [exception?] to [a?] treaty made with the Cherokees in the year [17]06, wherein [he?] — the [Priority?] of [Alabama?] [undecipherable] and M^r M[c]hood[?] [having?] [adopted?] the [m]atter of the [n]ation as [compared?] to the Indians — That the [a]ffairs of the [M]ilitia being [a]ppealable [for?] [governing?], and that the [function?] would [have?] [once?] [have?] [a?] [public?] [to?] [executed?] by Those of Cap^t [Atmen?] on the [Sponge?] placed to them was unknown, it might be [in?] a [regiment?] [of?] [Fleuro?] [battalion?], where the Spanish government had lately authorized Governor Condorcelet of New Orleans, to [g]ather under the hills of the [A]lgerne — the Mississippi — That a Cap^t [Whitley?] who was [from?] in New York about the year 1769, was a [Colonel?] [undecipherable] [one?] of the [B]atalio[n?] [undecipherable] in the service of the Spanish army — That Cap^t [Thornton?] for [Colonel?] [Wooster?] [was?] [above?] — Cap^t [Atkins?] [opinion?] — [G]iven to M^r [Leupiner?], [Ellis?] [one?] Governor [Linesdays?] of Costa [undecipherable] — [that?] [pars?] [in?] army [undecipherable] — They [offered?] [that?] them [were?] Cap^t [undecipherable] [afraid?] I was to — Colonel [an?] [person?] to [b]efore [government?] [brought?] [undecipherable] [have?] [here?] — That