Knox writes to Jackson
Document 1790Letter, discusses memorial for Cincinnati; discusses propriety of exclusive favors.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[undecipherable]
[in future] New York 16 May 1790 Recd. 12t. 1790
My dear friend
I have received yours of the 9th inst—
You [undecipherable] find by mine of last week that
your conclusion, on my journey was just, by
that I was in Philadelphia. I have not
yet had time to forward the [undecipherable] circular
letter to the several [States?] for [undecipherable] but
hope to do it the ensuing week
[undecipherable] You have involved me in an
embarassing predicament by asking my opinion
on the intended memorial of the [majority?]
[undecipherable] — [undecipherable] have [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] and [undecipherable] —
[undecipherable]
attempted for the army it [would] not be opposed even
of Congress, there [is?] not [undecipherable] but [undecipherable]
[to give?] an opinion [on] circumstances as [they appear?]
the officers preferring the memorial [undecipherable]
the [aspect] of endeavouring [undecipherable] in it
from an [unbiased?] [view?] by the account
of what they [seem to seek], [undecipherable]
that they may be benefited. But
themselves [anxious?] [having?] news of the
[public] [examination?] [effect?] on [undecipherable]
my exclusive advantage or [accelerate?]
any general provision. If this were [thought]
[the profit?] whereas the benefit of [preferring?]
the memorial. It may perhaps be [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] used by [contrary?] opposite [party?]
to strengthen [undecipherable] [against?]
[undecipherable]
as [you have formed?] it is drawn
upon general principles, and does not
[seem?] [undecipherable] to favor or [quest?] any
exclusive [benefits?] [undecipherable] any [moment?]
[another?] [individual?] would [undecipherable] it
[seems to?] be as unexceptionable as any
one that could be [devised] — But
[undecipherable] my opinion is
be known—
[A. [undecipherable]
16 May 1790
to [Jno?] [undecipherable]
Mem[orial?] [on?] [the?] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] [institution?]]
Type
Autograph Letter
Description
Letter, discusses memorial for Cincinnati; discusses propriety of exclusive favors.
Date
05/16/1790
Author
Recipient
Sent from
New York
Repository
Collection
Document number
1790051600001
Page start
1
Notable persons
Henry Jackson
Henry Knox
Notable locations
New York
Philadelphia
Notable items
officers
Congress should vote first
to give an opinion circumstanced as I am
officers preferring the memorial would seem the aspect of endeavoring to preclude men from an undoubted right
they may be benefitied
public cannot effect any exclusive advantage or accelerate any general provision
drawn upon general principles
favor or request any exclusive benefits
not yet had time to forward the circular letter to the several state
hope to do it the ensuing week
you have involved me in an embarrasing predicament by asking my opinion of the intended memorial
I have received yours
you will find by mine of last week that your conclusion

