Letter from the Commissioner of Army Accounts
Document 1787Letter from the Commissioner of Army Accounts; mentions Oliver Pollock and the United States Treasury.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (model sonnet 4.6). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
Richd July 25 – 1787
[undecipherable] last letter I informed you that it was
like that [undecipherable] should soon return as the business could
[undecipherable] presented by the State. I find
however that the State is determined to push the Settlement
notwithstanding their disadvantages, and therefore will
receive but a trifling sum as her balance, but I am
convinced of the fact that She has paid very largely, and
also that the United States have solemnly agreed to refund
her that part of these payments which shall be judged
reasonable, that if she is denied what is obviously her due
that it will have a tendency to make her discontented without
enquiring into the cause of her accounts not being closed with
the Union itself and as a pretence to her withholding her
supplies, which has caused me to take advantage of
our discretionary powers and to agree to allow the
State the average cost of a ration to those Troops that we
shall find to have been employed agreeably to the
terms of the Legion, also such bounty and Clothing as
they were entitled to, on the General principles that
as the Men appear on the Musters, their is the highest
evidence of their existence as Soldiers, and it being as necessary
and reasonable that they should be fed the reasons for that
it must have been the case – that the recruiting money was
advanced on account and to a much greater sum than the
[undecipherable] allowances amount to and therefore the Union cannot
reimburse her too much and that the Clothing of the Troops
has been at a most enormous expense to the State which
will be covered but very imperfectly by this principle –
As I steer clear of the Capital objections I have found against
the account and the whole burden which the Officers have
laid on the State by [underline: their] extravagance and improper drafts
on Pollock, I have reason to believe that this method will not
only be safe to the United States but also just to both
Parties I shall by this means also get the business
accomplished within a much shorter period than I
possibly could otherwise, for I have now no regard to the
Officers numerous payments and recitals of monies and
stores and saved from looking thro' a Cart Load of Papers – If
I possibly can I shall complete the whole before I return, which
will be very soon – I am at a loss however what method
I shall take in the following cases, in respect to the State
Vouchers whether it will be my duty to require them
of the State or will it not be more proper to refer them
to our report as presented by the State to the Treasury
for credit, the latter prevails as the one that must be
pursued, for I am a Commissioner to be appointed by Congress
but have no powers to act for the United States than the
others and cannot with a good face as a Commissioner, by
myself, ask for the Vouchers or refuse to sign the Report
before they are handed to me — My next difficulty is
whether I ought to sign the report, without O. Pollocks
account being first deducted, here again it appears to
me that I am anticipating what Congress have a right
to ask and expect which is that the same be discounted
previous to a Credit being given – the State you know
will refuse to let the discount be made by us, if the Commission
also refuses to let us make our report without its being
done the business is at a very disagreeable predicament &
too much is left to the decision of the umpire – Ought
the report to go into the hands of the State, or be
presented by us as Commissioners to the Treasury? your
advice given to me as soon as possible will be an
essential act of friendship, as I am unwilling
to run the hazard of an improper conduct on so important
an occasion.
[Pierce]
Mr Osgood
Richmond July 30th 1787
Gentlemen
A person this day from Charleston, informs me
that Russell, who it is said had the money placed in his
hands which was left with Mr. Alexander, was lately
in Charleston that he has sold all the money to different
People, and that he lives at or near Augusta in Georgia.
It appears to me very possible, from the conversation
I had with this man, that he is in possession of a considerable
part of it which he purchased from Russell and has now
come on to make his sale and is to repay him on his return —
I have paid my attention to find out the persons
holding this money before it was too late, and now I fear unless
some quick & alarming measures are taken with them
that it will altogether be lost — If Alexander
could be found an immediate attachment of him, would
be the most effectual way to bring the money back but
I hear he is also in Georgia, a place so lawless that
compulsory measures I fear will not be of consequence
Type
Letterbook
Description
Letter from the Commissioner of Army Accounts; mentions Oliver Pollock and the United States Treasury.
Date
07/25/1787
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Richmond
Document number
1787072521055
Page start
294
Notable persons
Osgood
John Pierce
Oliver Pollock
Congress
Treasury
commissioners
troops
Notable locations
Richmond
Notable items
Settlement
bounty
clothing
muster
supplies
vouchers
credit


