Woolsey not entitled
Document 1786Mr. Woolsey found not entitled to the years' pay mentioned in Bailey's letter. He must produce evidence to support his claim before it can be transmitted.
100%
⇣No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
now sells for about ⅔ in the Pound — and that the danger of establishing a precedent for payments a bove on those certificates, will prevent any success that you would other wise meet with on an application to Congress for that purpose, there being so many persons who are equally entitled, that it is impossible to extend justice to one a part, [without partiality]
H.P.
The Rev Mr Boyd }
New York June 8. 1786
Sir
I do not find that Mr Wesley is entitled to the [undecipherable] mentioned in yours of the 29th Ulto. it will therefore be necessary for him to produce evidence to support his claim before it can be admitted
H.P.
Mr Theodorus Barkley }
Office of Army Accounts
June 8. 1786
Dear Sir
I enclose you the Certificates due to Col Adams for which his brother has receipt to me — I have retained those and enclose them to you as I find charges against the Colonel which I did not know [for] certainty that you was possessed of when you forwarded
Type
Letterbook Copy
Description
Mr. Woolsey found not entitled to the years' pay mentioned in Bailey's letter. He must produce evidence to support his claim before it can be transmitted.
Date
06/01/1786
Author
Recipient
Sent from
New York
Document number
1786060121255
Page start
35
Notable persons
Theodorus Bailley
John Pierce
Notable locations
New York

