Report on Petition of Patrick Bennett
Document 1786Pierce's report to the Board of Treasury on the petition of Patrick Bennett (who was assigned to the Forage Master's Department) for "depreciation" pay recommending denial of the petition.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Office of Army Accounts May 5, 1786]
Gentlemen
Agreably to the direction of your honorable Board they beg to state on the petition of Patrick Bennett praying a depreciation [undecipherable] in the Forage Masters Department. —
That the paper money being a tender and considerate when paid, as a compleat discharge of all debts and contracts during the period of its circulation, it remains only with Congress to point out such characters or departments as they please to except from this general rule, and as there is not any provision of this nature for the Quarter Master Department, the executive Officers of Congress are not at present at liberty to make any such allowance. —
That Mr Bennett, having left the service agreeably to his own desire on the 17 March 1780 cannot be intitled to his depreciation, supposing that the Quarter Masters department are eventually to receive it and on the same principles with the Officers of the Line, because the Act of the 10 April 1780 granting the same, and the several subsequent resolutions of the 8th Day of August 1780 and the 15th of May and 15th of August 1780 have declared it to be the uniform intention of Congress, to exclude all such as were not in the service on that Day, I am therefore of opinion without a examination into the justness of granting the same to the Quarter Masters department, that Mr Bennett is clearly precluded from his depreciation.
The Board of Treasury
New York, May 8th 1786
Dear Sir
This is to acknowledge the receipt of the two Loan Office certificates mentioned in yours of the 24th Ulto amounting to nine hundred Dollars. I have not had any further communication with Mr Monier since my last nor has he I believe yet received the original Note from Canada, when the business is compleat I will inform you.
Mr John Winslow
New York May 6th 1786
Madam—
The certificates for the arrears due your late Husband are delivered to Capt Friend, who received them from me some time last Month.
Mrs Eleanor [undecipherable]
New York, May 6th 1786
Sir
I do myself the honor to enclose you a stating of the accounts of Major Captaine as settled between him and the United States. The certificate for the balance due him on his first settlement amounting to One thousand five hundred Dollars was delivered by me to Colonel [undecipherable: Gimat?] who I suppose carried it with him to France. This certificate is not yet placed on the same footing with the dues of the other French Gentlemen, that is, to draw Interest &c in France, as it is essential in order that this be done, that the certificate itself should be produced at the Treasury —
The other Balance of Four thousand one hundred & four Dollars 9/90 which was found due on his last settlement, together with the sum of Thirty eight Dollars 9/90 for Interest was paid into the hands of Mr Arch and Piters in Cash 933 9/90 dollars, and in a Certificate bearing Interest &c in France 3 202½ Dollars, being the amount of the whole demand of Major Captaine against the United States.
The Sieur Otto
New York, May 6th 1786
D S
Your favors of April 22d, 23d [undecipherable] your letter of the 14th March [undecipherable] and are answered — in respect to the Specie subsistance still due to the Maryland [undecipherable] other Southern Officers, I am at a loss how to conduct myself, but as there is no money in proof of any I presume there is necessity at present either to admit the whole on the attestation of the Officers respectively, or totally refuse the allowance, we have met with so many instances of deceptions that I should rather wish not to admit claims which may be made by such considerable numbers without some further check than an attestation. I have already informed you that Mr Mifflin will not come on to Annapolis, I wish you therefore to forward your papers to Mrs White. The Forage accounts are settled with the Forage Department or rather the Quarter Masters, that is, [undecipherable] that acted at the time and place where it ought to have been drawn, as the knowledge of the quantity drawn and of the settlements made can only rest with them. I have charged Gen Baker with the advances made by the State as you requested —
John White Esquire
Type
Author's Letterbook Copy
Description
Pierce's report to the Board of Treasury on the petition of Patrick Bennett (who was assigned to the Forage Master's Department) for "depreciation" pay recommending denial of the petition.
Date
05/05/1786
Author
Recipient
Sent from
Office of Army Accounts
Document number
1786050521255
Page start
9
Notable persons
Board of Treasury
John Pierce
Patrick Bennett
Forage Master's Department
Congress
Quartermasters Department
executive officers of Congress
officers of the line
Notable locations
Office of Army Accounts
Notable items
paper money
tender
paid
debts
contracts
circulation
departments
general rule
liberty
service
17 March 1780
depreciation
principles
act of 10 April 1780
resolutions of 8 August 1780
15 May
12 August 1783
examination
justice

