Claims of Brigadier General John Stark
Document 1786Fragment of a draft letter (first two pages only). Probably addressed to the Board of Treasury. Discusses his determinations regarding the claims of Brigadier General John Stark for compensation for expenses incurred during his service in the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
[Confidential]
Having examined this matter as I [undecipherable] refer'd to my Honorable Board, in the [undecipherable] I find the Claim sustained by his Agent; as to the following finding —
1o This [undecipherable] Proprietor is the [constituted?] [undecipherable]
2o His personal [undecipherable] as [undecipherable] expedition to
[strikethrough: [undecipherable] [undecipherable] [undecipherable]]
3o His [undecipherable] of [undecipherable] Military or [undecipherable], [undecipherable], [undecipherable]
formation [undecipherable]
of May 29 [undecipherable] 1798
No Claims on this head, from the general provisions to that an Officer is entitled whilst in service to Forage, which has urgent wants not been shown — but as I cannot be furnished with the regulations respecting the [undecipherable] rations allowed to an Officer of this rank, at the time of the [undecipherable] changes, at the period of his action, or with any data, by which I can be determined whether forage has or has not been drawn, and as I conceived, a proper note [undecipherable] late [undecipherable] to admit new claims of this nature whilst [undecipherable] might have been established at the time, with the proper Officer if the claim is [undecipherable] — I am of opinion that the charges under this head be refused [undecipherable]
The claimant is a [undecipherable] of the 2d article — his [undecipherable], a resolution of Congress of the 5th day of Nov. 1779 appropriating the [undecipherable], the [undecipherable] to the expedition to destroy the [undecipherable] at [undecipherable] Indians — which his agent says was in [undecipherable] seven [undecipherable], so [undecipherable] employed, that he appears to have been [undecipherable], and [undecipherable] a claimant in this resolution [undecipherable] to receive money for an —
[undecipherable] and expenses thereof, not [undecipherable] whether resolutions of Congress.
The claimant, it appears to me, not to have been the intention of Congress to allow any more than [undecipherable] pay [undecipherable] —
Your major Generals commanding in expeditions along [undecipherable] [undecipherable], and the small allowance to accommodate Officers when on active service — and if this provision was departed from, there would be no need to show of this notice to every Officer who has been obtained either by Congress or the Commander in Chief, [strikethrough: [undecipherable]] would be entitled to his expenses — it is necessary to bring evidence that there actually was a commanding Officer in this department, as the [undecipherable] to inform the Generals to their [undecipherable] supplies — I understood the contingent expenses of the expedition, to be the military contingences, and not less [undecipherable] personal expenses — and was therefore of opinion that the executive offices of Congress was [undecipherable] authorized to take upon themselves to admit expenses of this nature, especially [undecipherable] —
[undecipherable] I think his charges and that his [undecipherable] go [undecipherable] — as far as the [undecipherable] of a new [undecipherable] [undecipherable] I determine [undecipherable], this [undecipherable] has lead to all the amount continued in it fairly; telling the provisions with the generally attested operates also against the admission —
Type
Autograph Draft Letter
Description
Fragment of a draft letter (first two pages only). Probably addressed to the Board of Treasury. Discusses his determinations regarding the claims of Brigadier General John Stark for compensation for expenses incurred during his service in the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War.
Date
04/11/1786
Author
Recipient
Sent from
New York
Document number
1786041137001
Page start
1
Note
Not signed but in John Pierce's hand.
Image upgrade needed.
Notable persons
John Pierce
General Stark
Board of Treasury
agent
Brigadier in the Continental Service
the sick
officer
Congress
officers on detached commands
Major Generals commanding in several departments
regimental officers
Commander-in-Chief
commanding officer
executive officers of Congress
Notable locations
New York
Canada
St. Johns
department
Notable items
accounts
claims
forage
contingent expenses
expedition
transportation
baggage
regiments
general principle
service
regulations
rations
rank
price
ration
settled
charges
article
resolution of Congress
3 November 1777
command of an expedition to destroy the shipping at St. Johns
money
resolutions of Congress
allowance
extra service
evidence
supplies
military contingencies
personal expenses
articles

