Merits of a Petition
Document 1786Discusses the merits of a petition for pay of William Shattuck for his service in the Revolution in apprehending the supposed leader of an insurrection in favor of the British
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
New York March 11th 1786.
Gentlemen
[undecipherable] the [undecipherable] of yesterday, that [undecipherable] Shattuck, was author-[ized] by the Commander[s] in Chief sometime in the latter end of [last] year [1785], to [go] over to the New [Hampshire] [Grants], and immediately, to apprehend and convey [undecipherable] [Hamilton] of [Newfane?] and [Sam?] Wells of [Bennington?]. That this authority was [charged?] given to the Commander[s] in Chief, by a resolution of [Congress?] of the [undecipherable] of Nov[embe]r 1783, on an [information] received by them that these Persons were about to head an insurrection, in that Country in favor of the British Government. I that [the?] [Shattuck?] did [not?] convey any of these orders [until?] the [undecipherable] of Nov[embe]r 1785, deliver[ed] up to the commander in Chief [undecipherable] [Hamilton?], one of the above described persons.
On the state of facts above [described], I [doubt?] not [undecipherable] [after?] [waiting?] so long [a] time after [receiving] [them], without executing them, [undecipherable] render it [undecipherable] being [in the] Treaty of [peace?] to [release?] all fear from [the] insurrections and [undecipherable] granted [ample?] [security?] to the persons who had been [enemies?] to the United States. I must [confess?] that I am led to suppose, that this Person was taken up either from personal [resentment?]
[that he was]
or for his being considered, as Mr Shattuck states in his petition as insurgent against the government and Laws of New York, in which case it may appear [to] your Honorable Board to be an expence which ought rather to be defrayed by the State.
[undecipherable]
of the contingent expences of the service, and I am not in possession, of any information that can explain the reasonableness of Mr Shattuck's charges— had his orders been executed, while a fear existed [as to?] [in?] respect to the people of that country [were?] being in favor of the British, I suppose the guard he had taken was not more than sufficient, and the recompense [on?] [account?] he demands for his own [services?] would not have been more than what he [would have] had a right to expect for so material a service— but at present without further and more explicit [evidence?] I am unable to make up [an opinion?] that would be founded in justice.
[Copy?]
March 11, 1786
[undecipherable signature]
Type
Autograph Draft Letter
Description
Discusses the merits of a petition for pay of William Shattuck for his service in the Revolution in apprehending the supposed leader of an insurrection in favor of the British
Date
03/11/1786
Author
Recipient
Sent from
New York
Document number
1786031137001
Page start
1
Notable persons
Board of Treasury
John Pierce
William Shattuck
Commander-in-Chief
Luke Knowlton
Samuel Wells
Congress
British Government
United States
British
Notable locations
New York
New Hampshire Grants
Newsome
Brattleborough
Notable items
1782
authority
resolution of Congress
November 1782
insurrection
orders
November 1783
treaty of peace
security
petition
government
laws
expense
service
charges
guard
account

