Merits of a Petition
Document 1786Discusses the merits of a petition for pay of William Shattuck for his service in the Revolution in apprehending the supposed leader of an insurrection in favor of the British
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (model sonnet 4.6). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
New York March 11th 1786.
Gentlemen
[undecipherable] Board the
[undecipherable]
I find
observations of yesterday, that William Shattuck was author-
ized by the Commander in Chief some time in the latter
end of the year 1782 to proceed to the New Hamp. Grants
and immediately, apprehend and secure Luke Knowlton
of Newfane and Sand Wills of Brattleborough. that this
authority was [strikethrough: obtained] given to the Commander in Chief
by a resolution of Congress of the [undecipherable] of Nov 1782, one an
information received, by them that these Persons were
about to Head an insurrection in that Country in
favor of the British Government. & that the Shattuck
did in consequence, of these orders as being about the 2d of
Nov either 1783 deliver up to the commander in
Chief Luke Knowlton, one of the above described persons.
On the state of facts above seen a doubt arises
concerning his orders and
[undecipherable] which after waiting so long, a time after receiving
[undecipherable]
his orders without executing them, and when it was done what being done at the time
[undecipherable] after the treaty of peace had silenced all fears from
[undecipherable] administration and indeed granted ample security
to the persons who had been enemies to the United States,
I must confess that I am led to suppose, that this
Person was taken up either from personal [undecipherable]
that he was
or for his being considered, as Mr Shattuck states in
his petition as insurgent against the government and
Laws of New York, in which case it may appear
to your honorable Board to be an expence which
ought rather to be defrayed by the State.
[undecipherable] the Commander had [undecipherable]
of the contingent expenses of the service, and I am
not in possession, of any information that can
explain the reasonableness of Mr Shattuck's charges—
had his orders been executed while a fear existed a
that
respect to the people of that country more being in favor
of the British, I suppose the guard he had taken
was not more than sufficient, and the recompense
or are not
he demands for his own [undecipherable] would not have
been more than what he would [undecipherable] had a
right to expect for so material a service— but
at present without further and more explicit
evidence I am unable to make up an opinion
that would be founded in justice.
[undecipherable]
Type
Autograph Draft Letter
Description
Discusses the merits of a petition for pay of William Shattuck for his service in the Revolution in apprehending the supposed leader of an insurrection in favor of the British
Date
03/11/1786
Author
Recipient
Sent from
New York
Document number
1786031137001
Page start
1
Notable persons
Board of Treasury
John Pierce
William Shattuck
Commander-in-Chief
Luke Knowlton
Samuel Wells
Congress
British Government
United States
British
Notable locations
New York
New Hampshire Grants
Newsome
Brattleborough
Notable items
1782
authority
resolution of Congress
November 1782
insurrection
orders
November 1783
treaty of peace
security
petition
government
laws
expense
service
charges
guard
account


