Petition Denial
Document 1786Discusses the reasons for a recommended denial of the petition of Giles Wolcott for a refund of money lost on the retreat from Fort Ticonderoga in the Revolutionary War
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
New York March 6. 1786
Gentlemen
Having attended to the Petition of Mr Giles Wolcott, in consequence of directions from your Honorable Board, I am informed that the money which he says appears to have been lost by him on the retreat of our Army from Ticonderoga, cannot with propriety be refunded [strikethrough: to him] by the United States.
The witnesses he quotes [strikethrough: there] Colo Baldwin [strikethrough: and others allowed him and] visited several places, which [strikethrough: however within my knowledge], have been admitted; I proceed on this principle, that the money lost, belonged, was entrusted in their hands for the public service, and was not their own property — appears to be [strikethrough: almost probably to better] which does not letterance in respect to Mr Wolcott.
As The Paymaster of his regiment never had [strikethrough: any] he had recruiting monies committed into his hands, could not of the authority to course pay any out— and, I Mr Trumbull the PMr for the is now to presumed that Department would never have directed the sum of two hundred Dollars to be stopped from his pay, if it had been required for recruiting especially as at the time there was a ballance due to him on this account. I can therefore suppose, that Mr Wolcott labours under a mistake, when he supposes the sum of 200 Dols was stopped improperly from his pay. also There is also appears to be [strikethrough: transmitted] to the mistaken in respect to the sum of 100 Dols which he says he received from
late Warner, for recruiting, as has never [strikethrough: neither] charged by Colo not him Warner with this sum nor from has it [strikethrough: appeared] and from been on his old account will receive his spirits [strikethrough: The] There were indeed monies under have been charged to him by the Colo & D. which other means which, he acknowledges to have received from Colo Edwards given him
But the principal reason which induces me to believe that it appears by his money and admits to it sworn to by him that this money was his own property is, that [strikethrough: at Ticonderoga] when he says the same was lost, there is no ballance due to him of before the the 6 of July 1777 the time of the retreat, he had [strikethrough: received] the whole amount of the money which had [strikethrough: to him since been obtained] been paid to him for that service, if of course he could not have any of it on his hands— the money therefore which he lost on that day must have been his own, of it had at first as too [strikethrough: appears] been [strikethrough: paid,been] [undecipherable] for recruiting. our supposing reports
The Honble the Board of Treasury
[signed] [undecipherable] Copy of a letter to the Honble Board of Treasury [undecipherable] 1786
Type
Autograph Draft Document
Description
Discusses the reasons for a recommended denial of the petition of Giles Wolcott for a refund of money lost on the retreat from Fort Ticonderoga in the Revolutionary War
Date
03/06/1786
Author
Recipient
Sent from
New York
Document number
1786030637001
Page start
1
Notable persons
John Pierce
Board of Treasury
Giles Wolcott
Army
United States
Colonel Baldwin
paymaster of Wolcott's regiment
Mr. Trumbull
paymaster for the department
Colonel Warner
Notable locations
New York
Ticonderoga
Notable items
petition
money
retreat
public service
property
recruiting monies
sum
dollars
pay
balance
account
settlement
certificates
recruiting account
6 July 1777

