Settlement with Continental Regiments
Document 1786Discusses the general state of the settlement of the Army's accounts with the regiments of the states
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (a mix of sonnet and opus models). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
Pay Office
New York, January 24, 1785.
Gentlemen
A Remonstrance
Colo [Blodgett?] is entering the accounts of the Army, has
received charges against many persons to whom money
has been paid, either for pay, [subsistence], bounties, [on some]
account — and I find in the course of my settle-
ments brought as many of the Officers to account on
those principles as lay in my power, and [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] their accounts must stand in the Books of
this Office — but I have yet remaining numerous accounts
[undecipherable]
that cannot [be] settled, unless [undecipherable] [undecipherable]
[undecipherable] I give you this [idea] of my office
[undecipherable] — on which [undecipherable] suggest [my]
opinions on which, according to the nature of the several
accounts, I take the liberty to submit to your honor-
able Board, [that every] [remedy &] direction, and indeed
proceed on the most expeditious and regular plan in
the closing of so [intricate] a business —
[undecipherable] accounts
[undecipherable] books arose from [undecipherable] found
[undecipherable] the accounts were added at [that] time, I presume
[most] by [balancing] [abetting] the [unpaid] accounts
to which such accounts belong — or [the] [persons] [to] that
it is necessary to make a [person] [produce] vouchers
twice [—] [this] [does] [never] or to be [delivered] by them
and [stand] the [witnesses] at the time, must be now within
[undecipherable] can be [produced]
[The] Advances which were [paid] on [orders] for monies
received on account, [to] be [now] paid to others, or for recruiting, &
which are [entered], I propose to [work] out by States, [&] some
general account [of the] States, that of the [owners], [may] if it is
found [expedient], be [furnished] to the [executive] [officers] [to direct]
[or appointed] for the purpose
for the proper persons [that] returns may be brought for the
[bringing] of the money [& it] appears [& arranging]
[their accounts] only longer [open] in the United States Office,
where [unless] this [entitled] [has] [been] or [being] attended with
no [sufficient] — a [necessary] part of [these] accounts are likewise
charges against [Militia] Officers and the [Militia] in the Army,
who received their [payments] & [pay] [prior] to the [appointment]
[general] & [reorganizing] in 1778, [1780] and the beginning
of [1783] — [these] persons being now out of service from the
[loss] of [receiving] the money and scattered throughout
the States, [if] [alone], will [but] [few] of them [being any]
to [be] brought to account — they [attended the money] or [replenish]
vouchers under [direction] of the Army [of] the standing [persons]
[enough] in the nature of the duty of the Board and to
account, especially to the [object] of the Board and to
[those] who are no other [spot] to [possess] the money — as they
[Officers] had another duty of [convenience] to [perform] this
[and] [only] from [necessity] [omitted] in the situation
which they found themselves [—] many [every] [preparation] for their accounts
as an [incident] of [being] [at the] State or [requiring] claims to
account with the [parties], and as they [had] taken up the
[false] from foreign service, that they [had] been in the great
concern [producing] [sufficient] vouchers to satisfy the
* I beg leave also to suggest, that the [act] of Congress of Nov. 3d 1783, having
directed [meetings] [at] lower [cost] to the regimental agents [their] certificates, for
the monies due to the army, that I did [take] the agents & notify
in the following words [viz.] "Ro of [J.P.] — certificates amounting to —
[numbered] from — to — : all which certificates I do hereby promise
to deliver to the individuals to whom they respectively belong, or
"[deposit] them for their [benefit] at the [expiration] [& stated] of the
1783 [copies] of which receipts or obligations I have been
[entitled] to the respective [executives], [unless] [—] [that] the States
have only [called] on the agents to deliver up their remain-
ing certificates, without obliging them to account [&] [see] [that]
they [had given] [taken] [proper] vouchers from the individuals
[that] when they [had] delivered them over, we [but] [proceedings]
the agents at liberty to [retire] the certificates [established], &
has originated either from a [resolution] of [mention] & it
this [resolution] and of [the] one of May [4] 1785, so it [ought] not
to be the duty of [some] [Officer] to call [their] agents to account,
for which reason, I [beg to] request the attention of [Congress]
to this [subject], [that] the duty of the States or the Officers [of Congress]
may be [clearly] [—] after [this]
— and I beg leave [also] to suggest
the [propriety of]
[public], that the money was due, they were in the several
cases only accountable to the [men] [—] [at] payment
as they [had] generally never taken any vouchers [&] [also]
in many instances
they were [taken] from, lost or [miss-]laid them from the
incidents of the service — and as but a small part
[amount] of the money [and] probably "remains in the
[books of] [these] [Officers], [I] [suppose]
[persons] that [calling] [them] [taking] for their [—]
to call [their offices] to account will be attended with more
expense to the United States than any advantage that
may probably arise and therefore [believe] submit to
the consideration of the Board, the propriety of [balancing]
[their accounts], [by] [charging] [the same] to the [grant of]
the [real amount] of the pay of the Army; [—] to [—]
[just rule] of the settlement [made] by the [States] — [—] [would]
[&] make it [necessary] that I [produce] [an] account of the [charges]
which [ought] to be [made] on the [part] of the United States for
the [payments] [required] in the old [conditions] — but the States
[having] taken no [preparatory] [step] for the [proposed]
[—] them
[having] [along] the [disbursements] [occurred], & I [suppose] [—]
only [estimated] to the [continents] of the [balances] they have
[actually] paid for [depreciation]. [undecipherable]
[I presume] that [any] [to the commissions] as a [basis]
[tried balance in] accounts now rendered will be of
little [service], and that the accounts as they have been
kept by the States, cannot without [great] labor [to be]
[stated] in the [manner] [—] I have mentioned — I [take for]
[undecipherable]
[—] [and will] [be] [worked] [properly] [—]
[—], [to] beg leave to submit the same [to the]
[consideration] of the Board [—] [—] that I may
[take immediate steps] [thoroughly] [take] as early measures as possible
to [remove] liability.
[Board of Treasury]
Type
Autograph Draft Letter
Description
Discusses the general state of the settlement of the Army's accounts with the regiments of the states
Date
01/24/1786
Author
Recipient
Sent from
New York
Document number
1786012437101
Page start
1
Note
This letter is not signed but is written in John Pierce's hand.
Notable persons
John Pierce
Board of Treasury
Colonel Palfrey
Army
officers
militia officers
regimental paymasters
Congress
public
regimental agents
executors
officers of Congress
states
United States
the Continent
commissioners
Notable locations
New York
Pay Office
United States office
continent
Notable items
accounts
money
pay
subsistence
contingencies
account
settlements
books
direction
business
services
principle
vouchers
evidence
monies
recruiting
states
actions
regimental pay
1775
1776
1777
service
returns
musters
compensation
reward
resolves of Congress
foreign service
act of congress of 3 November 1783
certificates
arrears
receipts
obligations
May 1785
duty
charges
payments
old emissions
balances
depreciation

