Newspaper advertisements regarding Act of Congress limiting claims of army
Document 1785Was not Mr. Pierce's intention to publish the Act of Congress limiting the claims of the Army in every newspaper. Asks that Edes not promise any recompense to printers in his states.
No human transcription currently available for this document.
This transcription was generated by machine using Anthropic's Claude Code (model sonnet 4.6). It may contain errors or inaccuracies. Please verify against the document image. Learn more about our generative AI methodology.
as they propose to settle the accounts of General Haren and will want your assistance this business they inform me will not be entered on for some time at present they have nothing particular for your Inspection.
I wrote you on the 23 and 30th Ultimo, and sent the letters with their enclosures, directed to be left at the post office in hartford, which I hope you have Recd
Inclosed are two letters one private which I have read. the other from Mr Dunscomb which I think proper to forward to you, as I think myself not authorised to answer
In consequence of Mr Edes and Son letter I have wrote them, a copy of which is enclosed. — I am &c
John Pierce Esqr Jos: Howell
---
D Gentlemen. New York December 7th 1785.
Your favor of the 30th Ultimo was received this day. Mr Pierce being absent the business of the office is committed to my care this I thought necessary to premise in order to inform you that it was not Mr Pierces Intention to publish the act of Congress limiting the claims of the army" in every newspaper whereby the United States would have to account for such publication but left to the discretion of those printers who who published a news paper, not doubting they would oblige the public and a number of their Subscribers
[Still existing]
Subscribers, who I have reason to suppose have claims against the United States. I must therefore request on behalf of Mr Pierce, that you would not promise any recompence to the Several printers in your State for printing the advertisements, until the matter is made known to him — I have the
Benj: Edes & Son. Honor to be yr very H. Sert
Howell J.
---
Dear Sir. Hartford December 9th 1785.
I have received two letters from you one of about November 23d and the other of the 30th. and have written you two letters, one soon after my arrival and the other of November 30th — being here on some business and the post going in a few days, I write to inform you of my welfare.
In my last I requested you to inform me whether my pre-sence would be wanted as soon as I expected to return, and to consult the Board of Treasury on the subject.
I was to have set out next monday, but if possible I wish to stay till the begining of January — in respect to Paulints Papers, I do not remember that they were left with me — if they were you would have found them — I suppose Haren has them, and is willing to involve me in trouble before he delivers them — the recruiting account of Olivier, I do not know what to say about them — I think a bounty of 40/ was given at the first raising an army — but under what authority — I do not recollect — he undoubtedly is able to shew the reasons on the
Type
Letterbook Copy
Description
Was not Mr. Pierce's intention to publish the Act of Congress limiting the claims of the Army in every newspaper. Asks that Edes not promise any recompense to printers in his states.
Date
12/07/1785
Author
Recipient
Sent from
New York
Document number
1785120721155
Page start
144
Note
Enclosed in Howell to Pierce, 12/07/1785.
Notable persons
Joseph Howell
Congress
Mr. Pierce
Benjamin Edes and Son
printer
Notable locations
New York
Notable items
Act of Congress
Newspaper


