The Commissioners for settling the accounts of the Army to whom were referred on the 8^th of June last, the Petition of Duncaney Caney bills, beg leave to report: That said Caney bills has exhibited no account N^o 1. comprising, or incorporated therein ordered by Richmond, amounting to seventeen grounds on clothing &c^a which accounts your Commissioner beg leave to observe has been already paid, in an old account made by M^r Caney bills at Albany in May 1777. That he exhibits the account N^o 2, for advances made to his Men in Canada, amounting to one hundred & thirty nine Dols. in which your Commissioner is to opinion cannot be allowed, not be only for want of vouchers, but because that in a settlement made with the Department for in Point in July 1796, [strikethrough: that was] paid with his bounds the whole pay due to his Company [strikethrough: who was] [strikethrough: unable] him to reimburse them of for his advances, and to allow him payment, but he had also allowed to be recompensed by such sums as he previously said he had advanced to those left behind him in Canada. That he exhibits the account N^o 3, amounting to one hundred & ten grounds N^o 3 concerning, being advances made in Canada, by us his own Men, permitting them with Arms & Provisions, and paying their Voyages, in which your Commissioner beg to observe that it appears somewhat extraordinary, that it should not have been presented at the time, when by [undecipherable] to [undecipherable] payment [undecipherable] other advances in Canada, and that