Case of Fraud Against Roger Wolcot

100%

Hartford December 29th. 1784 Sir [Marginal note: #12/MIT] I have now the Satisfaction to acquaint you, that I am in a likely way to bring to pecuniary Punishment, one of the Knaves that were concerned in the Alteration and uttering of the Pay Master General’s Certificate No. 27.974 in favor of Benjamin Ray, which you will doubtless remember I brought to your Office on the 25th. of November last to be examined – The Case is as follows - (One Roger Wolcot of this State, procured a Neighbour to find the altered Note, by his Daughter (little known) to be sold in this City at Auction, by promising them a share of what it sold for ) on Complaint to a Magistrate, Wolcot was apprehended and examined, and upon Testimony of the Woman, it appeared so plainly to the Magistrate, that he altered the ^Note with fraudulent Intent, that he was ordered to Prison, unless he gave Bail for Two hundred pounds, for his Appearance for Trial before the Supreem Court, which is now fitting, but the Causee is not yet come on – he found Bail – but it is expected that the Bonds will be forfeited by his non Appearance – the Circumstances being so strong against ^him that he has hardly a chance of escaping corporal Punishment, if he should stand Trial – and only by neglecting to appear, the Forfeiture of the Bonds will be all the public Reparation he, or rather his Bondsmen, will be subjected to, by the Laws of this State, – but besides the criminal prosecution above recited, I have commenced an Action against him for private Damages, to be tried at a County Court in January – and altho his non Appearance on the criminal Suit may be taken as an implicit Confession of Guilt, yet he may have the Effontery to make a Defence in the civil Suit, in order to mitigate the Damages – therefore my Attorney informs me, that in order to my recovering adequate Damages, it will be necessary to produce your written Deposition, taken upon Oath before a Magistrate, or other competent Authority, setting forth the Facts and Circumstances that arose on my bringing the Note to the Office to be compared with the Record, - and that the Deposition be certified by the Magistrate, and sealed up, and directed to the adjourned County Court, to be holden at Hartford in Hartford County and State of Connecticut on the fourth Tuesday of January AD 1785 – I must therefore intreat the Favor of you, and the other Gentlemen Assistants in the Office, who were present on the 25th of Novemb last, to take the Trouble to give your Depositions jointly or severally, relative to the Subject, in the manner above desired — and that you would be pleased to forward the same by the Post, under Cover to me, early enough to answer my Purpose; and as it affects the public Interest of Credit, I suppose you can get the Letter franked, but if not, don’t fail to send it without – – – To’ refresh your memory I send a Copy of the Certificate you signed the 25th November, the purpose of which ought to be expressed in the Depositions and in order to subject the Offender (who is a Man of some property and Family) to the Severer mulet, it may be requisite to add some circumstances, not contained in the certificate, which actually took place, if you remember them - namely that upon your discovering (the alteration in the Sum, from 8 4/90 Dollars to 800 Dollars, and the artful manner in which it was executed, you was greatly surprised, and very much alarmed for the consequences) and to prevent the note effectually from defrauding any Body you began to deface it by drawing a Line of Ink crosswise upon the face of it - and (as it appeared to me) was unwilling to let it go out of the office again

  • but upon my making myself known, and giving you the strongest assurance that I should make no other use of it than to detect the ^ author of the knavery and recover my money, you permitted me to take it away with me - and further, if you had at that Time any Thoughts about destroying the tattered note, (to prevent Fraud and Injury), it will be best to express it in the Deposition - because every Circumstance that tends to prove any Risque I may have run, of losing my Property, or Reputation, must enhance the Damages I sue for - but far be it from me to ask wish any thing should be inserted in the Depositions but what is strictly true - whatever charge you may be at, I will cheerfully repay as soon as I know what it is - - In full perswasion that you will be so obliging as to comply with my present Request, in the properest and most authentic Manner and Form, and in due Season for the purpose - I am Sir Your most obedient and very humble Servant Wm Thompson Joseph Howell Jun. Esq Assistant Commissioner of Army Accounts Philadelphia or either of the Gentlemen Assistants in the Office PS: If Mr. Howell should be absent the Deposition of one or more of the Gentlemen who were present 25th of November last may serve to prove the Identity of the Note exhibited at that Time, the Sum for which it was given at first and the atten tion thereof, and other Circumstances that can be recollected

Type

Autograph Letter Signed

Description

Describes case of fraud against Roger Wolcot, who altered a note from the Paymaster General, and sold shares against the note. Request for deposition on the incident of fraud to be used in county court against Wolcott. Enclosed a copy of the testimony given in November regarding case of fraud. Discussed losing property and reputation.

Date

12/29/1784

Recipient

Sent from

Hartford

Document number

1784122990001

Page start

1

Notable persons

Joseph Howell
William Thompson
Benjamin Ray
Roger Wolcot
Paymaster General
magistrate
bondsman
attorney

Notable locations

Hartford
Hartford County
Connecticut
prison
county court

Notable items

note
certificate
bail
deposition
merlet